Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359375›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Capacity Building of Gynecologists in Cancer Screening Through Hybrid Training Approach.

Kavitha Dhanasekaran, Roshni Babu, Vipin Kumar, Ravi Mehrotra, Roopa Hariprasad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Project ECHO for Cancer Care: a Scoping Review of Provider Outcome Evaluations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kavitha DhanasekaranDepartment of Clinical Oncology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I - 7, Sector - 39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201 301, India.
Roshni BabuICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Vipin KumarDepartment of Clinical Oncology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I - 7, Sector - 39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201 301, India.
Ravi MehrotraICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Roopa HariprasadDepartment of Clinical Oncology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I - 7, Sector - 39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201 301, India. roopaicmr@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2032-3432
National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training health care professionals (HCPs) is one of the most challenging and key factors for the success of a cancer screening program. In order to make this onerous task possible, a hybrid training model, combining the online knowledge-sharing tool of ECHO (Extension of Community Health Outcomes) and in-person training, was proposed by the National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (NICPR). The main aim of this article is disseminating our experience on the effectiveness of this hybrid model in training health care providers in cancer prevention. A group of gynecologists was trained using a structured curriculum in cervical and breast cancer screening through a 14-week online course, followed by a three-day in-person training (group A). To analyze the effectiveness of this model, a group of gynecologists who were not part of the online course were enrolled for face-to-face training (group B). All the participants were offered pre- and post-training questionnaires and a pictorial quiz. Group A participants had 60% and 40% more knowledge in cervical and breast cancer screening, respectively, compared with group B before the in-person training. Though group B demonstrated a 51% increase in knowledge post-training, group A performed 26% better than group B in the pictorial quiz-demonstrating better knowledge acquisition. This hybrid training model, when employed in capacity building in cancer screening among gynecologists, works very effectively in improving knowledge and skill set in cancer screening. This can be a potent tool for the government for efficient training of HCPs in cancer screening.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingCurriculumEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleGynecologyHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer preventionCancer screening trainingCapacity buildingECHO modelHybrid training

Identifiers

PMID31359375
OpenAlexW2966704096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.