ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020
Capacity Building of Gynecologists in Cancer Screening Through Hybrid Training Approach.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing cancer care through a knowledge-sharing model: a systematic review of Project ECHOBMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators for the use of telehealth by healthcare providers in India-A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Project ECHO for Cancer Care: a Scoping Review of Provider Outcome Evaluations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Training primary healthcare workers on a task-strengthening strategy for integrating hypertension management into HIV care in Nigeria: implementation strategies, knowledge uptake, and lessons learned.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on an online cancer screening training programme for healthcare providers in the public sector in India: learnings from a hub and spoke model perspective.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- Asking physicians how best to implement cervical cancer prevention services in India: A qualitative study from Mysore.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Advancing the Science of Implementation for Resource-Limited Settings through Bidirectional Learning Around Cervical Cancer Screening.Ethnicity & disease · 2022Article
- A multimodal mentorship intervention to improve surgical quality in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a convergent, mixed methods assessment.Human resources for health · 2021Article
- Symposium report: breast cancer in India-trends, environmental exposures and clinical implications.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Review
- Factors influencing the retention of participants in online cancer screening training programs in India.BMC medical education · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training health care professionals (HCPs) is one of the most challenging and key factors for the success of a cancer screening program. In order to make this onerous task possible, a hybrid training model, combining the online knowledge-sharing tool of ECHO (Extension of Community Health Outcomes) and in-person training, was proposed by the National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (NICPR). The main aim of this article is disseminating our experience on the effectiveness of this hybrid model in training health care providers in cancer prevention. A group of gynecologists was trained using a structured curriculum in cervical and breast cancer screening through a 14-week online course, followed by a three-day in-person training (group A). To analyze the effectiveness of this model, a group of gynecologists who were not part of the online course were enrolled for face-to-face training (group B). All the participants were offered pre- and post-training questionnaires and a pictorial quiz. Group A participants had 60% and 40% more knowledge in cervical and breast cancer screening, respectively, compared with group B before the in-person training. Though group B demonstrated a 51% increase in knowledge post-training, group A performed 26% better than group B in the pictorial quiz-demonstrating better knowledge acquisition. This hybrid training model, when employed in capacity building in cancer screening among gynecologists, works very effectively in improving knowledge and skill set in cancer screening. This can be a potent tool for the government for efficient training of HCPs in cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.