Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359368›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2019

Clinical Characteristics and Glycemic Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Requiring Maximum Dose Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed-Ratio Combination or Insulin Glargine in the LixiLan-L Trial.

Lawrence Blonde, Timothy S Bailey, Jason Chao, Terry A Dex, Juan Pablo Frias, Luigi F Meneghini, Michelle Roberts, Vanita R Aroda

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT02058160. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02058160 phase3completed

A Randomized, 30-week, Active-controlled, Open Label, 2- Treatment Arm, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination to Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Ran2014Enrolled736Registered outcomes15Posted comparisons8ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsInsulin glargine (HOE901), Insulin glargine/lixisenatide (HOE901/AVE0010), Metformin (Background drug)
PMID 27650977other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Participant Characteristics on Clinical Outcomes with iGlarLixi in Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of SPARTA Japan.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lawrence BlondeDepartment of Endocrinology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA. lblonde@ochsner.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-6698
Timothy S BaileyAMCR Institute, Inc., Escondido, CA, USA.
Jason ChaoXinyi, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Terry A DexSanofi US, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Juan Pablo FriasNational Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Luigi F MeneghiniUT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.
Michelle RobertsSanofi US, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Vanita R ArodaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductioniGlarLixi is a titratable, fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine (iGlar, 100 units/ml) and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 LixiLan-L trial (NCT02058160) investigated baseline characteristics, glycemic control, and safety outcomes in participants who received the study-specified maximum dose (60 units/day) of iGlarLixi or iGlar vs. those who received < 60 units/day.

methodsOutcomes were compared for participants receiving 60 or < 60 units/day at week 30. Endpoints analyzed included change in A1C, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial glucose (2-h PPG), body weight, proportion of participants achieving A1C < 7.0%, proportion of participants receiving rescue therapy, documented symptomatic hypoglycemia, and gastrointestinal adverse event (GI AE) incidence.

resultsBy week 30, 27% (iGlarLixi) and 31% (iGlar) of participants received the maximum dose. Participants on 60 vs. < 60 units/day were younger and had higher body weight, body mass index (BMI), FPG, and baseline insulin dose. In both dose groups, A1C change from baseline was significantly greater with iGlarLixi vs. iGlar, and more participants treated with iGlarLixi vs. iGlar achieved A1C < 7.0%. No significant differences were observed in change from baseline for A1C, FPG, 2-h PPG, or GI AE incidence between insulin dose groups, regardless of treatment. In both treatment arms, incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was lower in participants receiving 60 units/day vs. those receiving < 60 units/day. Participants treated with iGlarLixi (< 60 or 60 units/day) had modest weight loss over 30 weeks vs. an increase in weight compared with iGlar.

conclusionsMaximum doses of iGlarLixi were required in participants with a more insulin-resistant clinical phenotype (younger, higher BMI, FPG, and insulin doses). Benefits were observed with iGlarLixi vs. iGlar, even at 60 units/day, with more participants achieving glycemic goals, no increase in symptomatic hypoglycemia, and a modest reduction in body weight.

fundingSanofi US, Inc.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBody WeightClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide-2 ReceptorGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlargineMaleMiddle AgedPeptidesBlood GlucoseGlucagon-Like Peptide-2 ReceptorGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlarginelixisenatidePeptidesGLP-1 RAGlycemic controlHypoglycemiaInsulin doseType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31359368
PMCPMC6822975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.