Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359289›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2019

Use of a choice survey to identify adult, adolescent and parent preferences for vaccination in the United States.

Tara A Lavelle, Mark Messonnier, Shannon Stokley, David Kim, Aparna Ramakrishnan, Achamyeleh Gebremariam, Norma-Jean E Simon, Angela M Rose, Lisa A Prosser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tara A LavelleCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. tlavelle@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Mark MessonnierNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Shannon StokleyNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
David KimNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Aparna RamakrishnanDevi Partners, LLC, 112 Madera Ave, San Carlos, CA, 94070, USA.
Achamyeleh GebremariamSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Norma-Jean E SimonAnn and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, 225 East Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Angela M RoseSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Lisa A ProsserSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

CDC HHS U01IP000499NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult and adolescent vaccination rates are far below coverage targets in the United States. Our objective was to identify the most influential factors related to vaccine uptake among adults, adolescents, and parents of adolescents (parents) in the United States.

methodsWe used a fractional factorial design to create a binary choice survey to evaluate preferences for vaccination. The national survey was fielded to a sample of adults, adolescents ages 13-17 years, and parents, using a national probability-based online research panel in November 2015. Respondents were presented with 5 profiles of a hypothetical vaccine and asked in a series of questions whether they would accept each vaccine. We analyzed the binary choice data using logistic regression in STATA v13 (College Station, TX) to calculate the odds that a participant would choose to accept the vaccine.

resultsWe received completed responses from 334 (51%) of 652 adults, 316 (21%) of 1516 adolescents, and 339 (33%) of 1030 parents. Respondents were generally representative of the U.S. POPULATION: Vaccine effectiveness was the most influential factor in the choice to vaccinate for all groups. Other most influential factors were primary care provider (PCP) recommendation and the out-of-pocket cost of the vaccine. Other factors such as risk of illness, risk of vaccine side effects, vaccination location, and time for vaccination were not important in the decision to get vaccinated.

conclusionsAdults, adolescents, and parents are most sensitive to vaccine effectiveness, PCP recommendation, and out-of-pocket cost for vaccination in their decision to get vaccinated. Strong PCP recommendations that focus on vaccine effectiveness and health care policies that minimize out-of-pocket costs for vaccinations may increase vaccine uptake by adults and adolescents.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultsimmunization ratesParentsStated preferencesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID31359289
PMCPMC6663948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.