Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359267›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2019

Clinical measurements obtained from point-of-care ultrasound images to assess acquisition skills.

Brian P Lucas, Antonietta D'Addio, Clay Block, Harold L Manning, Brian Remillard, James C Leiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian P LucasMedicine Service, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA. brian.p.lucas@dartmouth.edu.
Antonietta D'AddioGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Clay BlockMedicine Service, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Harold L ManningGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Brian RemillardGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
James C LeiterGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

SYNERGY: The Dartmouth Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001086 · NCATS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GREEN, ALAN I · 2013 to 2017
$18.3M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences UL1TR001086NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent methods of assessing competence in acquiring point-of-care ultrasound images are inadequate. They rely upon cumbersome rating systems that do not depend on the actual outcome measured and lack evidence of validity. We describe a new method that uses a rigorous statistical model to assess performance of individual trainees based on the actual task, image acquisition. Measurements obtained from the images acquired (the actual desired outcome) are themselves used to validate effective training and competence acquiring ultrasound images. We enrolled a convenience sample of 21 spontaneously breathing adults from a general medicine ward. In random order, two trainees (A and B) and an instructor contemporaneously acquired point-of-care ultrasound images of the inferior vena cava and the right internal jugular vein from the same patients. Blinded diameter measurements from each ultrasound were analyzed quantitatively using a multilevel model. Consistent mean differences between each trainee's and the instructor's images were ascribed to systematic acquisition errors, indicative of poor measurement technique and a need for further training. Wider variances were attributed to sporadic errors, indicative of inconsistent application of measurement technique across patients. In addition, the instructor recorded qualitative observations of each trainee's performance during image acquisition.

resultsFor all four diameters, the means and variances of measurements from trainee A's images differed significantly from the instructor's, whereas those from trainee B's images were comparable. Techniques directly observed by the instructor supported these model-derived findings. For example, mean anteroposterior diameters of the internal jugular vein obtained from trainee A's images were 3.8 mm (90% CI 2.3-5.4) smaller than from the instructor's; this model-derived finding matched the instructor's observation that trainee A compressed the vein during acquisition. Instructor summative assessments agreed with model-derived findings, providing internal validation of the descriptive and quantitative assessments of competence acquiring ultrasound images.

conclusionsClinical measurements obtained from point-of-care ultrasound images acquired contemporaneously by trainees and an instructor can be used to quantitatively assess the image acquisition competence of specific trainees. This method may obviate resource-intensive qualitative rating systems that are based on ultrasound image quality and direct observation, while also helping instructors guide remediation.

Indexed as

AnthropometryClinical competenceMultilevel analysisPoint-of-care systemsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31359267
PMCPMC6638581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.