Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359211›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021

Female Genital Cutting and Deinfibulation: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Research and Practice.

Sonya S Brady, Jennifer J Connor, Nicole Chaisson, Fatima Sharif Mohamed, Beatrice Bean E Robinson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Perception of African Immigrant Women Living in Spain Regarding the Persistence of FGM.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sonya S BradyDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 South Second Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA. ssbrady@umn.edu.
Jennifer J ConnorProgram in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicole ChaissonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Fatima Sharif MohamedPhoenix Integrated Residency in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Beatrice Bean E RobinsonProgram in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Treatment of Consequences of Female Genital CuttingR01HD091685 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CONNOR, JENNIFER JO, ROBINSON, BEATRICE "BEAN" ELLEN · 2018 to 2023
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At least 200 million girls and women across the world have experienced female genital cutting (FGC). International migration has grown substantially in recent decades, leading to a need for health care providers in regions of the world that do not practice FGC to become knowledgeable and skilled in their care of women who have undergone the procedure. There are four commonly recognized types of FGC (Types I, II, III, and IV). To adhere to recommendations advanced by the World Health Organization (WHO) and numerous professional organizations, providers should discuss and offer deinfibulation to female patients who have undergone infibulation (Type III FGC), particularly before intercourse and childbirth. Infibulation involves narrowing the vaginal orifice through cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or labia majora, and creating a covering seal over the vagina with appositioned tissue. The WHO has published a handbook for health care providers that includes guidance in counseling patients about deinfibulation and performing the procedure. Providers may benefit from additional guidance in how to discuss FGC and deinfibulation in a manner that is sensitive to each patient's culture, community, and values. Little research is available to describe decision-making about deinfibulation among women. This article introduces a theoretically informed conceptual model to guide future research and clinical conversations about FGC and deinfibulation with women who have undergone FGC, as well as their partners and families. This conceptual model, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, may facilitate conversations that lead to shared decision-making between providers and patients.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleFemaleHumansDeinfibulationFemale circumcisionFemale genital cuttingFemale genital mutilationInfibulationReinfibulationShared decision-makingTheory of Planned Behavior

Identifiers

PMID31359211
PMCPMC6987000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.