Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359171›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2019

Treatment Strategies and Effective Management of Phantom Limb-Associated Pain.

Ivan Urits, Danica Seifert, Allison Seats, Stephen Giacomazzi, Michael Kipp, Vwaire Orhurhu, Alan D Kaye, Omar Viswanath

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for phantom limb pain- a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Phantom Limb Pain Management.The Journal of hand surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan UritsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. iurits@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Danica SeifertCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Allison SeatsCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Stephen GiacomazziCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Michael KippValley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Vwaire OrhurhuBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Omar ViswanathValley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Arizona Pain Specialists · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCreighton University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPhantom sensations are incompletely understood phenomena which take place following an amputation or deafferentation of a limb. They can present as kinetic, kinesthetic, or exteroceptive perceptions. It is estimated that phantom limb pain (PLP) affects anywhere from 40 to 80% of amputees. RECENT

findingsPsychiatric illnesses such as depression, anxiety, and mood disorders have higher prevalence in amputees than in the general population. Pharmacologic treatment has been used as first-line therapy for amputees suffering from PLP with agents including gabapentinoids, amitriptyline, and other tricyclic anti-depressants, opioids, and local anesthetics. Non-invasive treatment modalities exist for PLP including sensory motor training, mirror visual therapy, and non-invasive neuromodulation. Non-invasive neuromodulation includes interventions like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation. While many promising therapies for PLP exist, more clinical trials are required to determine the efficacy and protocols needed for maximum benefit in patients suffering from PLP.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementPhantom LimbTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsAmputationPain managementPhantom limbPhantom limb painPLP

Identifiers

PMID31359171
OpenAlexW2965915329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.