Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359160›Full record

SynthesisCurrent cardiology reports2019

Imaging Approaches for Coronary Artery Anomalies: Purpose and Techniques.

Paolo Angelini

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cardiac evaluation of paediatric athletes.European heart journal · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paolo AngeliniCenter for Coronary Artery Anomalies, Texas Heart Institute, 6624 Fannin Street, Suite 2780, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. pangelini@leachmancardiology.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewComprehensive discussion of alternative techniques in imaging coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) in different diagnostic scenarios. RECENT

findingsAt primary screening, intramural course essentially correlates with stenosis and clinical repercussion in some types of CAAs. Potential clinical aims in imaging patients with CAAs may be primary screening, severity evaluation, preoperative planning, and postoperative follow-up. Appropriate techniques are echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Rarely, IVUS may be needed in patients with potentially serious CAAs and has unique advantages and limitations. IVUS data are essential for in-depth knowledge of mechanisms of coronary dysfunction (exercise-related dynamic stenosis of variable severity) and for indicating interventional treatment. In adolescents or adults, intramural course of an anomalous coronary artery is the only important feature accompanied by stenosis of potential severity and is especially relevant in patients with a high-risk status (elite sport athletes, military recruits).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCoronary Vessel AnomaliesCoronary VesselsHumansAthlete screeningCoronary artery anomaliesCoronary artery stenosisIntravascular ultrasoundSudden death in athletes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.