Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359112›Full record

GuidelineDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019

[Recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone : Expert recommendation of the working group on acute pain of the German Pain Society, the scientific working group on pain medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the surgical working group on acute pain of the German Society for Surgery with participation of representatives of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association].

U M Stamer, T Stammschulte, J Erlenwein, W Koppert, S Freys, W Meißner, P Ahrens, E-M Brede, M Lindig, M Dusch and 11 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

U M StamerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinik Bern, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Freiburgstraße, 3010, Bern, Schweiz. ulrike.stamer@dbmr.unibe.ch.
T StammschulteArzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft, Berlin, Deutschland.
J ErlenweinKlinik für Anästhesiologie, GF Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
W KoppertKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
S FreysChirurgische Klinik, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland.
W MeißnerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
P AhrensAbteilung Anästhesie und operative Intensivmedizin, Aller-Weser-Klinik, Verden, Deutschland.
E-M BredeKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Zentrum Interdisziplinäre Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
M LindigKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
M DuschKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
S HeitfeldKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, UniversitätsSchmerzCentrum Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
E HoffmannKlinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin, Notfall- und Schmerzmedizin, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Herne, Herne, Deutschland.
E A LuxKlinik für Schmerz- und Palliativmedizin, Katholisches Klinikum Lünen-Werne, Lünen, Deutschland.
E MüllerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
D Pauli-MagnusKlinik für Anästhesie, Schmerztherapie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland.
E Pogatzki-ZahnKlinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
C Quaisser-KimpfbeckAbteilung für Anästhesie und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Freising, Freising, Deutschland.
U RingelerAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Palliativ‑, Intensiv- und Schmerzmedizin, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
H RittnerArzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft, Berlin, Deutschland.
J UlmaKlinik für Schmerzmedizin und Schmerzambulanz, Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland.
S WirzAbteilung für Anästhesie, Interdisziplinäre Intensivmedizin, Schmerzmedizin/Palliativmedizin, Zentrum für Schmerzmedizin, Weaningzentrum, CURA-GFO Kliniken Bonn, Bad Honnef, Deutschland.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEArzneimittelkommission der deutschen ÄrzteschaftDRK Kliniken Berlin · DEJena University Hospital · DEKatholisches Klinikum Lünen/Werne , St.-Marien-Hospital Lünen · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DEKrankenhaus St. Joseph-Stift Bremen · DEKrankenhaus vom Roten Kreuz · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATParacelsus-Klinik Golzheim Düsseldorf · DESt. Marien-Hospital Bonn · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDipyrone (metamizole) is widely used for perioperative pain management in countries where it is marketed; however, uncertainty exists concerning the safe use of this drug, specifically considering the rare adverse event of an agranulocytosis.

methodsAs evidence from published studies was lacking, an expert panel developed recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone. After a formal, structured consensus process, the recommendations were approved by the involved medical societies.

resultsThe panel agreed that blood cell counts shall not be standard for short-term perioperative use in patients unless they are at risk for neutropenia. The medical staff shall be aware of the symptoms and course of action when agranulocytosis is suspected. Patients shall be informed about the risks and benefits of dipyrone and about potential alternatives. The expert group concluded that dipyrone has a relatively positive risk-benefit ratio compared to other nonopioid analgesics. The group strongly recommended educating patients about the symptoms of agranulocytosis if they have received dipyrone over several days and/or treatment is to be continued after discharge, because agranulocytosis can occur several days after discontinuation of metamizole. Further recommendations refer to the information of the physician taking over the patient's care after discharge and the avoidance of re-exposure in patients having previously suffered from dipyrone-induced agranulocytosis.

conclusionThe group's recommendations shall be communicated in order to raise medical staff's and patients' awareness of the appropriate use of dipyrone in the perioperative period.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnesthesiologyAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDipyroneAnalgesicsCritical CareHumansAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDipyroneBlood cell countDipyrone (metamizole), safetyPatient educationPerioperative careRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31359112
OpenAlexW2967801780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.