ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019
No differences in rest myocardial blood flow in stunned and hibernating myocardium: insights into the pathophysiology of ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of major arrhythmic outcomes in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: value of hibernating myocardium in positron emission tomography/computed tomography.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Article
- Long-term impact of myocardial inflammation on quantitative myocardial perfusion-a descriptive PET/MR myocarditis study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT for the assessment of myocardial tracer uptake in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease: Initial experiences and results.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Growth Differentiation Factor 15 is Related with Left Ventricular Recovery in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Successful Reperfusion by Primary Percutaneous Intervention.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe human pathophysiology of stunned, hibernating and scarred myocardium in ischemic cardiomyopathy is a subject of controversy. While the "smart heart" theory postulates that reduced myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest is responsible for myocytes switching to a state of hibernation, other theories suggest that a reduced myocardial flow reserve (MFR) may be the cause.
methodsWe included 110 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Based on quantitative myocardial perfusion assessment and viability imaging with
resultsCompared to remote myocardium, dysfunctional but viable myocardium (including stunned and hibernating) had reduced rest MBF (0.89 mL/min/g vs. 0.79 and 0.76 mL/min/g, respectively; p < 0.001) and MFR (1.53 vs. 1.27 and 1.17; p < 0.001). Between stunned and hibernating myocardium, however, rest MBF and MFR did not differ (p = 0.40). In scarred myocardium, rest MBF was lowest (0.66 mL/min/g; p < 0.001) but, in contrast to the other myocardial states, k2 (i.e., tracer washout) was increased (0.199/min vs. 0.178/min to 0.181/min; all p < 0.05 in pairwise comparison).
conclusionsIn patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, impaired MFR is associated with stunning and hibernation. These states of dysfunctional but viable myocardium have lower rest MBF compared to remote myocardium. At the end of the continuum, rest MBF is lowest in scar tissue and linked to increased rate of tracer washout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.