Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359099›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Effectiveness of using STOPP/START criteria to identify potentially inappropriate medication in people aged ≥ 65 years with chronic kidney disease: a randomized clinical trial.

Krystina Parker, Ingrid Bull-Engelstad, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Willy Aasebø, Nanna von der Lippe, Morten Reier-Nilsen, Ingrid Os, Knut Stavem

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02424786 (Non-adherence and Polypharmacy in Elderly Patients With Chronic Renal Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02424786 nacompletednot on this map

Non-adherence and Polypharmacy in Elderly Patients With Chronic Renal Failure: Predictors and an Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2015 to 2017Enrolled180ConditionsAdherenceArmsSTOPP/START criteria
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Krystina ParkerDepartment of Nephrology, Medical Division, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. krystina.parker@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-6842
Ingrid Bull-EngelstadDepartment of Nephrology, Medical Division, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen Hospital, Drammen, Norway.
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Willy AasebøDepartment of Nephrology, Medical Division, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Nanna von der LippeDepartment of Nephrology, Medical Division, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Morten Reier-NilsenDepartment of Nephrology, Medical Division, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen Hospital, Drammen, Norway.
Ingrid OsFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Knut StavemFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NODrammen Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOAkershus University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePolypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing are common in elderly with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study identified potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) using the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP) and the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment (START) criteria in elderly with advanced CKD and determined the effect of a medication review on medication adherence and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

methodsThe intervention consisted of a medication review using STOPP/START criteria with a recommendation to a nephrologist or similar review without a recommendation. End points were prevalence of PIP and PPO, medication adherence, and HRQoL. Group differences in outcomes were assessed using a generalized linear mixed model. The trial was registered under www.clinicaltrial.gov (ID: NCT02424786).

resultsWe randomized 180 patients with advanced CKD (mean age 77 years, 23% female). The prevalence of PIPs and PPOs in the intervention group was 54% and 50%, respectively. The odds of PPOs were lower in the intervention than the control group (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.92, p = 0.032), while there was no intergroup difference in the number of PIPs (OR 0.57, CI 0.27-1.20, p = 0.14). There was no difference in changes in medication adherence or HRQoL from baseline to 6 months between the groups.

conclusionsThe intervention with the STOPP/START criteria identified a high prevalence of inappropriate medications in the elderly with advanced CKD and reduced the number of PPOs. However, there was no detectable impact of the intervention on medication adherence or HRQoL.

Indexed as

Potentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedAged, 80 and overDrug Utilization ReviewFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMedication AdherenceQuality of LifeRenal Insufficiency, ChronicChronic kidney diseaseElderlyInappropriate medicationMedication adherencePolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID31359099
OpenAlexW2964440629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.