Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358953›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2019

Early diagnosis of Pearson syndrome in neonatal intensive care following rapid mitochondrial genome sequencing in tandem with exome sequencing.

Lauren S Akesson, Stefanie Eggers, Clare J Love, Belinda Chong, Emma I Krzesinski, Natasha J Brown, Tiong Y Tan, Christopher M Richmond, David R Thorburn, John Christodoulou and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of universal genome sequencing in infant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren S AkessonVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stefanie EggersVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clare J LoveVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Belinda ChongVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Emma I KrzesinskiMonash Genetics, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Natasha J BrownVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tiong Y TanVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Christopher M RichmondVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David R ThorburnVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7725-9470
John ChristodoulouVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-0641
Matthew F HunterMonash Genetics, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sebastian LunkeVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-0723
Zornitza StarkVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Zornitza.Stark@vcgs.org.au.
The University of Melbourne · AUVictorian Clinical Genetics Services · AUMonash Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid genomic testing is a valuable new diagnostic tool for acutely unwell infants, however exome sequencing does not deliver clinical-grade mitochondrial genome sequencing and may fail to diagnose mitochondrial disorders caused by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variants. Rapid mitochondrial genome sequencing and analysis are not routinely available in rapid genomic diagnosis programmes. We present two critically ill neonates with transfusion-dependent anaemia and persistent lactic acidosis who underwent rapid mitochondrial genome sequencing in tandem with exome sequencing as part of an exome sequencing-based rapid genomic diagnosis programme. No diagnostic variants were identified on examination of the nuclear exome data for either infant. Mitochondrial genome sequencing identified a large mtDNA deletion in both infants, diagnosing Pearson syndrome within 74 and 55 h, respectively. Early diagnosis in the third week of life allowed the avoidance of a range of other investigations and appropriate treatment planning. Rapid mitochondrial genome analysis provides additional diagnostic and clinical utility and should be considered as an adjunct to exome sequencing in rapid genomic diagnosis programmes.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisAcyl-CoA Dehydrogenase, Long-ChainCongenital Bone Marrow Failure SyndromesDNA, MitochondrialExomeExome SequencingFemaleGenetic TestingGenome, MitochondrialHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalLipid Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsMaleMitochondriaMitochondrial DiseasesAcyl-CoA Dehydrogenase, Long-ChainDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID31358953
PMCPMC6871088
OpenAlexW2966491844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.