ReviewSpinal cord2019
Enhanced recovery after surgery in intramedullary and extramedullary spinal cord lesions: perioperative considerations and recommendations.
Review in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of nursing interventions based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients with lumbar disc herniation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Role of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (mERAS) in awake craniotomy performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC); a single center retrospective study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive surgery, precise anesthesia and effective analgesia are crucial for walking within 1 hour after lung surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Article
- Prognostic factors for surgically managed intramedullary spinal cord tumours: a single-centre case series.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based approach developed to ameliorate the patient recovery process following surgical procedures. Employing a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach, ERAS implements strategies and treatment paradigms that have been shown to improve patient outcomes, reduce hospital length of stay, and ultimately reduce healthcare costs. With a substantial body of the literature supporting the implementation of ERAS in other surgical specialties, ERAS has only recently made its foray into spine surgery. Despite this, current studies are limited to spinal deformity and degenerative disease, with limited data regarding spinal cord surgery. This is due in part to the complex nature and rarity of spinal cord lesions, making the establishment of a formal ERAS protocol difficult. In developing an ERAS protocol, there must be a consensus on what factors are important to consider and implement. To address this, we reviewed the most recent advances in intramedullary and extramedullary spinal cord surgery in order to identify elements that influence patient outcomes. Using this information, the authors provide evidence-based recommendations with the intent of introducing a framework for future ERAS protocols with respect to treating spinal cord lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31358909What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.