Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358909›Full record

ReviewSpinal cord2019

Enhanced recovery after surgery in intramedullary and extramedullary spinal cord lesions: perioperative considerations and recommendations.

Sauson Soldozy, Parantap Patel, Mazin Elsarrag, Pedro Norat, Daniel M Raper, Jennifer D Sokolowski, Kaan Yağmurlu, Min S Park, Petr Tvrdik, M Yashar S Kalani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sauson SoldozyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-0112
Parantap PatelDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Mazin ElsarragDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Pedro NoratDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Daniel M RaperDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jennifer D SokolowskiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Kaan YağmurluDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-2809
Min S ParkDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Petr TvrdikDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
M Yashar S KalaniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA. stemcelldoctor@kalanimed.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based approach developed to ameliorate the patient recovery process following surgical procedures. Employing a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach, ERAS implements strategies and treatment paradigms that have been shown to improve patient outcomes, reduce hospital length of stay, and ultimately reduce healthcare costs. With a substantial body of the literature supporting the implementation of ERAS in other surgical specialties, ERAS has only recently made its foray into spine surgery. Despite this, current studies are limited to spinal deformity and degenerative disease, with limited data regarding spinal cord surgery. This is due in part to the complex nature and rarity of spinal cord lesions, making the establishment of a formal ERAS protocol difficult. In developing an ERAS protocol, there must be a consensus on what factors are important to consider and implement. To address this, we reviewed the most recent advances in intramedullary and extramedullary spinal cord surgery in order to identify elements that influence patient outcomes. Using this information, the authors provide evidence-based recommendations with the intent of introducing a framework for future ERAS protocols with respect to treating spinal cord lesions.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryHumansPerioperative CareSpinal Cord DiseasesSpinal Cord Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.