Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358846›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

An experimental study of a virtual reality counselling paradigm using embodied self-dialogue.

Mel Slater, Solène Neyret, Tania Johnston, Guillermo Iruretagoyena, Mercè Álvarez de la Campa Crespo, Miquel Alabèrnia-Segura, Bernhard Spanlang, Guillem Feixas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mel SlaterEvent Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. melslater@ub.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6223-0050
Solène NeyretEvent Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5871-1305
Tania JohnstonEvent Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8491-5480
Guillermo IruretagoyenaEvent Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercè Álvarez de la Campa CrespoEvent Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-5328
Miquel Alabèrnia-SeguraDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Bernhard SpanlangVirtual Bodyworks S.L., Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9659-635X
Guillem FeixasDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6288-6009
Universitat de Barcelona · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESNeurosciences Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When faced with a personal problem people typically give better advice to others than to themselves. A previous study showed how it is possible to enact internal dialogue in virtual reality (VR) through participants alternately occupying two different virtual bodies - one representing themselves and the other Sigmund Freud. They could maintain a self-conversation by explaining their problem to the virtual Freud and then from the embodied perspective of Freud see and hear the explanation by their virtual doppelganger, and then give some advice. Alternating between the two bodies they could maintain a self-dialogue, as if between two different people. Here we show that the process of alternating between their own and the Freud body is important for successful psychological outcomes. An experiment was carried out with 58 people, 29 in the body swapping Self-Conversation condition and 29 in a condition where they only spoke to a Scripted Freud character. The results showed that the Self-Conversation method results in a greater perception of change and help compared to the Scripted. We compare this method with the distancing paradigm where participants imagine resolving a problem from a first or third person perspective. We consider the method as a possible strategy for self-counselling.

Indexed as

CounselingVirtual RealityAdolescentAdultBody ImageFemaleHumansMalePsychology, ExperimentalSelf ConceptUser-Computer InterfaceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31358846
PMCPMC6662659
OpenAlexW2966276998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.