Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358791›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in Korea.

Si-Hyuck Kang, Sun-Hwa Kim, Jun Hwan Cho, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Seung-Sik Hwang, Hae-Young Lee, Tae-Jin Youn, In-Ho Chae, Cheol-Ho Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Temporal trends in adherence to lifestyle recommendations of patients with hypertension in Korea, 2007-2021.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Si-Hyuck KangCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-6367
Sun-Hwa KimCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea.
Jun Hwan ChoCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea.
Chang-Hwan YoonCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea.
Seung-Sik HwangGraduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-7831
Hae-Young LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Tae-Jin YounCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea.
In-Ho ChaeCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea.
Cheol-Ho KimCardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea. cheolkim@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to describe the temporal trends in prevalence and management status of hypertension in Korea between 1998 and 2015. Data of adults who were aged 30 years or older were extracted from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationwide representative population-based survey. Hypertension was prevalent in 30.5% of Korean adults. The age and sex standardized prevalence showed little change between 1998 and 2015. The elderly population and men showed higher prevalence. The rates of awareness, treatment, and control showed substantial improvements among hypertensive subjects between 1998 and the time period of 2007‒2009 (awareness, from 23.5 to 66.3%; treatment, from 20.4 to 60.3%; and control, from 4.9 to 42.1%), after which the numbers reached a plateau and no significant changes were observed subsequently (67.3%, 63.6%, and 46.2%, respectively, between 2013 and 2015). The management status remained poor especially among the young population and in men. In conclusion, the hypertension prevalence remained stable at approximately 30% in Korea between 1998 and 2015. While awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension improved remarkably, the young population and particularly men showed a suboptimal management status.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAge FactorsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRepublic of KoreaRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31358791
PMCPMC6662850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.