Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358725›Full record

ReviewRevista espanola de salud publica2019

[Non-caloric sweeteners in pregnancy and lactation].

Brian M Cavagnari

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian M CavagnariEscuela de Nutrición. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud de la Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Buenos Aires. Argentina.
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many pregnancies have a weight gain that is higher than recommended, situation that carries several risks for the mother and her child. As a strategy to achieve a lower weight gain, the replacement of sugar-sweetened foods and beverages by those with non-caloric sweeteners could be a choice for pregnant or puerperal mothers. The objective of this article is to review the available evidence regarding the use of non-caloric sweeteners during pregnancy and lactation. Pregnancy is not a period to lose weight, so it would not be advisable to perform hypocaloric diets. However, to achieve an adequate weight gain during pregnancy, many women choose to consume food and beverages with non-caloric sweeteners. During pregnancy, the consumption of cyclamate, saccharin and crude stevia leaf should be avoided, as well as that of stevia infusions or extracts of the whole leaf. Regarding the rest of the approved non-caloric sweeteners, their consumption during pregnancy and lactation is considered to be safe, as long as they are consumed in moderation, adhering to their admissible daily intake levels. Aspartame does not reach breast milk. While saccharin, sucralose, and acesulfame-K are detectable in breast milk, their concentration is several orders of magnitude below their admissible daily intake levels.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingLactationPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietFemaleGestational Weight GainHumansMaternal BehaviorMilk, HumanNon-Nutritive SweetenersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsNon-Nutritive SweetenersLactationNon-caloric sweetenersPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31358725
PMCPMC10308837
OpenAlexW2993523422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.