Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358639›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Infants expect leaders to right wrongs.

Maayan Stavans, Renée Baillargeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Cognitive Architecture of Infant Attachment.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Toddlers draw broad negative inferences from wrongdoers' moral violations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Correlates of conflict resolution across cultures.Evolutionary human sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychological foundations of human status allocation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maayan StavansPsychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel; mstavans.uiuc@gmail.com rbaillar@illinois.edu.
Renée BaillargeonPsychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61820 mstavans.uiuc@gmail.com rbaillar@illinois.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropological and psychological research on direct third-party punishment suggests that adults expect the leaders of social groups to intervene in within-group transgressions. Here, we explored the developmental roots of this expectation. In violation-of-expectation experiments, we asked whether 17-mo-old infants (

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentLeadershipPsychology, ChildSocial BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantMalePunishmentdirect third-party punishmentinfancyleadershipnorm enforcementsociomoral cognition

Identifiers

PMID31358639
PMCPMC6697782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.