Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358583›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2019

Population Pharmacokinetics of Unbound Ceftolozane and Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients without Renal Dysfunction.

Fekade B Sime, Melissa Lassig-Smith, Therese Starr, Janine Stuart, Saurabh Pandey, Suzanne L Parker, Steven C Wallis, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A Roberts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A novel mechanism of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. TargetingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Pharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fekade B SimeUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4061-2063
Melissa Lassig-SmithDepartment of Pharmacy and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Therese StarrDepartment of Pharmacy and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Janine StuartDepartment of Pharmacy and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Saurabh PandeyUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Suzanne L ParkerUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Steven C WallisUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia j.roberts2@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-435X
The University of Queensland · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of dosing regimens for critically ill patients requires pharmacokinetic data in this population. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam in critically ill patients without renal impairment and to assess the adequacy of recommended dosing regimens for treatment of systemic infections. Patients received 1.5 or 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam according to clinician recommendation. Unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma concentrations were assayed, and data were analyzed with Pmetrics with subsequent Monte Carlo simulations. A two-compartment model adequately described the data from twelve patients. Urinary creatinine clearance (CL

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPseudomonas aeruginosaTazobactamAnti-Bacterial Agentsceftolozaneceftolozane, tazobactam drug combinationCephalosporinsTazobactamceftolozanecritically illdosingintensive care unitpopulation pharmacokineticstazobactam

Identifiers

PMID31358583
PMCPMC6761554
OpenAlexW2965452221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.