Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358030›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

Vitamin D receptor expression in invasive breast tumors and breast cancer survival.

Linnea Huss, Salma Tunå Butt, Signe Borgquist, Karin Elebro, Malte Sandsveden, Ann Rosendahl, Jonas Manjer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Impact of vitamin D deficiency and inflammatory biomarkers on pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Vitamin DScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Linnea HussDepartment of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden. Linnea.Huss@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-9224
Salma Tunå ButtDepartment of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Signe BorgquistDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University, Aarhus University Hospital, DE-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Karin ElebroDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Malte SandsvedenDepartment of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Ann RosendahlDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas ManjerDepartment of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SEAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D has been suggested to prevent and improve the prognosis of several cancers, including breast cancer. We have previously shown a U-shaped association between pre-diagnostic serum levels of vitamin D and risk of breast cancer-related death, with poor survival in patients with the lowest and the highest levels respectively, as compared to the intermediate group. Vitamin D exerts its functions through the vitamin D receptor (VDR), and the aim of the current study was to investigate if the expression of VDR in invasive breast tumors is associated with breast cancer prognosis.

methodsVDR expression was evaluated in a tissue microarray of 718 invasive breast tumors. Covariation between VDR expression and established prognostic factors for breast cancer was analyzed, as well as associations between VDR expression and breast cancer mortality.

resultsWe found that positive VDR expression in the nuclei and cytoplasm of breast cancer cells was associated with favorable tumor characteristics such as smaller size, lower grade, estrogen receptor positivity and progesterone receptor positivity, and lower expression of Ki67. In addition, both intranuclear and cytoplasmic VDR expression were associated with a low risk of breast cancer mortality, hazard ratios 0.56 (95% CI 0.34-0.91) and 0.59 (0.30-1.16) respectively.

conclusionsThis study found that high expression of VDR in invasive breast tumors is associated with favorable prognostic factors and a low risk of breast cancer death. Hence, a high VDR expression is a positive prognostic factor.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAgedBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReceptors, CalcitriolSwedenBiomarkersReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, humanBreast cancerMortalitySurvivalTissue microarrayVitamin D receptor

Identifiers

PMID31358030
PMCPMC6664551
OpenAlexW2965236997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.