Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358026›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2019

Dummy-run for standardizing plan quality of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for postoperative uterine cervical cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG1402).

Hiroyuki Okamoto, Naoya Murakami, Fumiaki Isohashi, Takahiro Kasamatsu, Yoko Hasumi, Kotaro Iijima, Shie Nishioka, Satoshi Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Teiji Nishio and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Knowledge-based planning using pseudo-structures for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of postoperative uterine cervical cancer: a multi-institutional study.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki OkamotoDepartment of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. hiokamot@ncc.go.jp.
Naoya MurakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Fumiaki IsohashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takahiro KasamatsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, 130-8575, Japan.
Yoko HasumiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, 101-8643, Japan.
Kotaro IijimaDepartment of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Shie NishiokaDepartment of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Satoshi NakamuraDepartment of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Mitsuhiro NakamuraDepartment of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Teiji NishioDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Hiroshi IgakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yuko NakayamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Jun ItamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Satoshi IshikuraDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Yasumasa NishimuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Takafumi ToitaRadiation Therapy Center, Okinawa Chubu Hospital, Okinawa, 904-2293, Japan.
Tokyo National Hospital · JPKindai University · JPKyoto University · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JPNagoya City University · JPOkinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital · JPOsaka University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 18K15613Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI JP16K10398National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 29-A-3National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 30-A-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess compliance with treatment planning in a dummy-run for a multicenter clinical trial involving patients with high-risk postoperative uterine cervical cancer using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (JCOG1402 trial).

methodsFor the dummy-run, we prepared a computed tomography dataset comprising two anonymized cases of post-hysterectomy cervical cancer. These were sent to the 47 participating institutions to assess institutional plan quality such as delineations and dose distributions.

resultsCentral review showed 3 and 4 deviations per treatment plan on average. The deviations related to the nodal and vaginal cuff clinical target volume (CTV) delineation, which accounted for approximately 50% of the total deviations. The CTV vaginal cuff showed considerable differences in delineation compared with the nodal CTV. For the Dice similarity coefficient, case 1 showed a mean ± 1σ of 0.81 ± 0.03 and 0.60 ± 0.09 for the nodal and the CTV vaginal cuff, respectively, while these were 0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.54 ± 0.14, respectively, for case two. Of the 47 institutions, 10 were required to resubmit their treatment plan because the delineations, planning target volume margin, and required dose distributions were not in accordance with the JCOG1402 protocol.

conclusionsThe dummy-run test in postoperative uterine cervical cancer demonstrated substantial deviations in the delineations, particularly for the CTV vaginal cuff. The analysis data could provide helpful information on delineation and planning, allowing standardization of IMRT planning for postoperative uterine cervical cancer.

trial registrationJapanese Clinical Trial Registry #: UMIN000027017 at https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000030672;language=J.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansHysterectomyOrgans at RiskPostoperative PeriodPrognosisQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerDummy-runIMRTVMAT

Identifiers

PMID31358026
PMCPMC6664568
OpenAlexW2964781052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.