Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31358020›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

A whole slide image-based machine learning approach to predict ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) recurrence risk.

Sergey Klimov, Islam M Miligy, Arkadiusz Gertych, Yi Jiang, Michael S Toss, Padmashree Rida, Ian O Ellis, Andrew Green, Uma Krishnamurti, Emad A Rakha and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: application and future perspectives.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergey KlimovDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Islam M MiligyDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Arkadiusz GertychDepartment of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yi JiangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael S TossDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Padmashree RidaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Ian O EllisDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Andrew GreenDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Uma KrishnamurtiDepartment of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emad A RakhaDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Emad.Rakha@Nottingham.Ac.Uk.
Ritu AnejaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. raneja@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · USUniversity of Nottingham · GBCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USEmory University · USNottingham City Hospital · GB

Funding

Evaluation of centrosome amplification as a risk-predictor for breast cancer aggrU01CA179671 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA179671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represent approximately 20% of screen-detected breast cancers. The overall risk for DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving surgery stems almost exclusively from local recurrence. Although a mastectomy or adjuvant radiation can reduce recurrence risk, there are significant concerns regarding patient over-/under-treatment. Current clinicopathological markers are insufficient to accurately assess the recurrence risk. To address this issue, we developed a novel machine learning (ML) pipeline to predict risk of ipsilateral recurrence using digitized whole slide images (WSI) and clinicopathologic long-term outcome data from a retrospectively collected cohort of DCIS patients (n = 344) treated with lumpectomy at Nottingham University Hospital, UK.

methodsThe cohort was split case-wise into training (n = 159, 31 with 10-year recurrence) and validation (n = 185, 26 with 10-year recurrence) sets. The sections from primary tumors were stained with H&E, then digitized and analyzed by the pipeline. In the first step, a classifier trained manually by pathologists was applied to digital slides to annotate the areas of stroma, normal/benign ducts, cancer ducts, dense lymphocyte region, and blood vessels. In the second step, a recurrence risk classifier was trained on eight select architectural and spatial organization tissue features from the annotated areas to predict recurrence risk.

resultsThe recurrence classifier significantly predicted the 10-year recurrence risk in the training [hazard ratio (HR) = 11.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3-25.3, accuracy (Acc) = 0.87, sensitivity (Sn) = 0.71, and specificity (Sp) = 0.91] and independent validation [HR = 6.39 (95% CI 3.0-13.8), p < 0.0001;Acc = 0.85, Sn = 0.5, Sp = 0.91] cohorts. Despite the limitations of our cohorts, and in some cases inferior sensitivity performance, our tool showed superior accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value, concordance, and hazard ratios relative to tested clinicopathological variables in predicting recurrences (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, it significantly identified patients that might benefit from additional therapy (validation cohort p = 0.0006).

conclusionsOur machine learning-based model fills an unmet clinical need for accurately predicting the recurrence risk for lumpectomy-treated DCIS patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorImmunohistochemistryMachine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerDCISDigital image analysisMachine learningPrognosisRecurrence prediction

Identifiers

PMID31358020
PMCPMC6664779
OpenAlexW2966656188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.