ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019
A whole slide image-based machine learning approach to predict ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) recurrence risk.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transforming histologic assessment: artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and personalized treatment.British journal of cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Benchmarking Open-Source Pathology Foundation Models for Breast Cancer Biomarker Prediction from H&E Whole-Slide Images.Cancers · 2026Article
- MCLAM: a cost-effective deep learning model for predicting recurrence risk in HR+/HER2- breast cancer-a multi-center study in a Chinese cohort.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Article
- Unlocking the prognostic power of pathomics in bladder cancer: a machine learning odyssey across multiple centers.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A novel multimodal framework integrating pathomics, deep learning, and machine learning for breast cancer histological grades classification.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Margin of Error: The Emerging Role of Field Cancerization in Predicting Recurrence Risk of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deep learning for predicting invasive recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ: leveraging histopathology images and clinical features.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for predicting breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review of clinical and imaging data.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- A morphometric signature to identify ductal carcinoma in situ with a low risk of progression.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Advancing precision medicine: the transformative role of artificial intelligence in immunogenomics, radiomics, and pathomics for biomarker discovery and immunotherapy optimization.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
- Image analysis-based identification of high risk ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Pathomics models for CD40LG expression and prognosis prediction in glioblastoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deep learning applications in breast cancer histopathological imaging: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-based morphometric signature to identify ductal carcinoma in situ with low risk of progression to invasive breast cancer.Research square · 2023Article
- Predicting early breast cancer recurrence from histopathological images in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.NPJ breast cancer · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: application and future perspectives.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Biological insights and novel biomarker discovery through deep learning approaches in breast cancer histopathology.NPJ breast cancer · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represent approximately 20% of screen-detected breast cancers. The overall risk for DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving surgery stems almost exclusively from local recurrence. Although a mastectomy or adjuvant radiation can reduce recurrence risk, there are significant concerns regarding patient over-/under-treatment. Current clinicopathological markers are insufficient to accurately assess the recurrence risk. To address this issue, we developed a novel machine learning (ML) pipeline to predict risk of ipsilateral recurrence using digitized whole slide images (WSI) and clinicopathologic long-term outcome data from a retrospectively collected cohort of DCIS patients (n = 344) treated with lumpectomy at Nottingham University Hospital, UK.
methodsThe cohort was split case-wise into training (n = 159, 31 with 10-year recurrence) and validation (n = 185, 26 with 10-year recurrence) sets. The sections from primary tumors were stained with H&E, then digitized and analyzed by the pipeline. In the first step, a classifier trained manually by pathologists was applied to digital slides to annotate the areas of stroma, normal/benign ducts, cancer ducts, dense lymphocyte region, and blood vessels. In the second step, a recurrence risk classifier was trained on eight select architectural and spatial organization tissue features from the annotated areas to predict recurrence risk.
resultsThe recurrence classifier significantly predicted the 10-year recurrence risk in the training [hazard ratio (HR) = 11.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3-25.3, accuracy (Acc) = 0.87, sensitivity (Sn) = 0.71, and specificity (Sp) = 0.91] and independent validation [HR = 6.39 (95% CI 3.0-13.8), p < 0.0001;Acc = 0.85, Sn = 0.5, Sp = 0.91] cohorts. Despite the limitations of our cohorts, and in some cases inferior sensitivity performance, our tool showed superior accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value, concordance, and hazard ratios relative to tested clinicopathological variables in predicting recurrences (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, it significantly identified patients that might benefit from additional therapy (validation cohort p = 0.0006).
conclusionsOur machine learning-based model fills an unmet clinical need for accurately predicting the recurrence risk for lumpectomy-treated DCIS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.