Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357999›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care.

Gregory M Peterson, Grant Russell, Jan C Radford, Nick Zwar, Danielle Mazza, Simon Eckermann, Judy Mullan, Marijka J Batterham, Athena Hammond, Andrew Bonney

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Primary care stability as a social determinant.Frontiers in health services · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gregory M PetersonSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart and Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
Grant RussellDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jan C RadfordSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart and Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
Nick ZwarFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.
Danielle MazzaDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Simon EckermannAustralian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Judy MullanSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Marijka J BatterhamStatistical Consulting Centre, School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong; National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong; and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Athena HammondSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Andrew BonneySchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. abonney@uow.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2477-1646

Funding

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is international interest in whether improved primary care, in particular for patients with chronic or complex conditions, can lead to decreased use of health resources and whether financial incentives help achieve this goal. This trial (EQuIP-GP) will investigate whether a funding model based upon targeted, continuous quality incentive payments for Australian general practices increases relational continuity of care, and lessens health-service utilisation, for high-risk patients and children.

methodsWe will use a mixed methods approach incorporating a two-arm pragmatic cluster randomised control trial with nested qualitative case studies. We aim to recruit 36 general practices from Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRN) covering urban and regional areas of Australia, randomised into intervention and control groups. Control practices will provide usual care while intervention practices will be supported to implement a new service model incorporating incentives for relational continuity and timely access to appointments. Patients will comprise three groups: older (over 65 years); 18-65 years with chronic and/or complex conditions; and those aged less than 16 years with increased risk of hospitalisation. The funding model includes financial incentives to general practitioners (GPs) for providing longer consultations, same day access and timely follow-up after hospitalisation to enrolled patients. The payments are proportional to expected health system savings associated with improved quality of GP care. An outreach facilitator will work with practices to help incorporate the incentive model into usual work. The main outcome measure is relational continuity of care (Primary Care Assessment Tool short-form survey), with secondary outcomes including health-related quality of life and health service use (hospitalisations, emergency presentations, GP and specialist services in the community, medicine prescriptions and targeted pathology and imaging ordering). Outcomes will be initially evaluated over a period of 12 months, with ongoing data collection for 5 years. DISCUSSION: The trial will provide robust evidence on a novel approach to providing continuous incentives for improving quality of general practice care, which can be compared to block payment incentives awarded at target quality levels of pay-for-performance, both within Australia and also internationally.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000105246. Registered on 23 January 2018.

Indexed as

General PracticePrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementReimbursement, IncentiveAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaChildCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansMiddle AgedPatient SelectionContinuity of careFundingGeneral practiceHealth service utilisationIncentivisationPrimary careQuality

Identifiers

PMID31357999
PMCPMC6664524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.