Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357992›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Linking observational data from general practice, hospital admissions and diabetes clinic databases: can it be used to predict hospital admission?

Sarah Dennis, Jane Taggart, Hairong Yu, Bin Jalaludin, Mark F Harris, Siaw-Teng Liaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah DennisFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-9246
Jane TaggartCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Hairong YuCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Bin JalaludinIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Mark F HarrisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Siaw-Teng LiawCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. siaw@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

HCF Health and Medical Research Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLinking process of care data from general practice (GP) and hospital data may provide more information about the risk of hospital admission and re-admission for people with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to extract and link data from a hospital, a diabetes clinic (DC). A second aim was to determine whether the data could be used to predict hospital admission for people with T2DM.

methodsData were extracted using the GRHANITE™ extraction and linkage tool. The data from nine GPs and the DC included data from the two years prior to the hospital admission. The date of the first hospital admission for patients with one or more admissions was the index admission. For those patients without an admission, the census date 31/03/2014 was used in all outputs requiring results prior to an admission. Readmission was any admission following the index admission. The data were summarised to provide a comparison between two groups of patients: 1) Patients with a diagnosis of T2DM who had been treated at a GP and had a hospital admission and 2) Patients with a diagnosis of T2DM who had been treated at a GP and did not have a hospital admission.

resultsData were extracted for 161,575 patients from the three data sources, 644 patients with T2DM had data linked between the GPs and the hospital. Of these, 170 also had data linked with the DC. Combining the data from the different data sources improved the overall data quality for some attributes particularly those attributes that were recorded consistently in the hospital admission data. The results from the modelling to predict hospital admission were plausible given the issues with data completeness.

conclusionThis project has established the methodology (tools and processes) to extract, link, aggregate and analyse data from general practices, hospital admission data and DC data. This study methodology involved the establishment of a comparator/control group from the same sites to compare and contrast the predictors of admission, addressing a limitation of most published risk stratification and admission prediction studies. Data completeness needs to be improved for this to be useful to predict hospital admissions.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2General PracticeHospitalizationMedical Record LinkageAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHospital Information SystemsHumansMaleMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMiddle AgedObservationYoung AdultGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanData linkageData qualityHospital admissionPrimary careType-2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31357992
PMCPMC6661817
OpenAlexW2965701214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.