Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357950›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2019

Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact.

Estelle E Seyman, Natan Bornstein, Eitan Auriel, Oren Cohen, Tania Nissel, Hen Hallevi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Estelle E SeymanDivision of Neurology, Stroke Department, Tel-Aviv Sorasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel. seyman.estelle@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-0323
Natan BornsteinDepartment of Neurology Shaarey-Tzedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Bait Street, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eitan AurielDepartment of Neurology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Oren CohenSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel.
Tania NisselDivision of Neurology, Stroke Department, Tel-Aviv Sorasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel.
Hen HalleviDivision of Neurology, Stroke Department, Tel-Aviv Sorasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundB-mode and Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) are the methods of choice for screening and determining the degree of Carotid artery stenosis. The evaluation of stenosis with calcification may be hampered by a common CDUS artifact known as acoustic shadow (AS). Our objective was to assess the change in reliability of CDUS readings in the presence of an AS artifact.

methodsSingle center retrospective observational study. Included were patients with either an AS artifact or high-grade stenosis (defined by peak systolic velocity (PSV) > 240 cm/s) demonstrated in CDUS, and had a CT angiography (CTA) done within 6 months of the sonographic exam. All subjects were identified through the Tel-Aviv Sorasky medical center (TASMC) CDUS unit registry from which clinical information was extracted. CDUS images were manually reviewed grading AS magnitude. All CTAs were reviewed and reconstructed for accurate assessment of percent stenosis and were used as gold standard.

resultsThe study cohort included 227 consecutive patients (corresponding with 454 internal carotid arteries) meeting inclusion criteria. 43.2% of the arteries (n = 195) had an AS artifact present on CDUS, regardless of percent stenosis, with a large artifact present in 6.7% arteries (n = 30). Older age was significantly related to the presence of AS artifact (p < 0.001). In the study cohort as a whole there was a strong correlation between percent stenosis on CTA and PSV values (Pearson's r 0.672, p < 0.001) regardless of AS existence. The CDUS sensitivity and specificity for predicting severe stenosis were 82 and 73% respectively. The presence of a small AS slightly diminished the correlation between CDUS and CTA results without compromising CDUS reliability. A large AS severely affected the correlation between CDUS and CTA exams (Pearson's r = 0.24, p = 0.27) and reduced CDUS reliability with a sensitivity and specificity of 62%.

conclusionThe presence of a large AS severely degrades the accuracy of the routine CDUS measurements. In these cases, the patient should be referred to a CDUS exam including doppler-measurement of periorbital arteries and intracranial arteries in addition to other imaging modalities such as CTA or MRA in order to assess future stroke risk.

Indexed as

ArtifactsUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid ArteriesCarotid Artery, CommonCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid StenosisComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAcoustic shadowCarotid artery stenosisColor Doppler ultrasoundIschemic stroke

Identifiers

PMID31357950
PMCPMC6664737
OpenAlexW2965714251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.