Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357929›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Improving prediction of phenotypic drug response on cancer cell lines using deep convolutional network.

Pengfei Liu, Hongjian Li, Shuai Li, Kwong-Sak Leung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Pan-Cancer Ex Vivo Drug Screen Atlas for Functional Precision Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Drug Sensitivity Prediction Based on Multi-stage Multi-modal Drug Representation Learning.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengfei LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong, China. pfliu@cse.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1510-0621
Hongjian LiSDIVF R&D Centre, Hong Kong Science Park, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Shuai LiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Kwong-Sak LeungDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the phenotypic drug response on cancer cell lines plays a vital role in anti-cancer drug discovery and re-purposing. The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database provides open data for researchers in phenotypic screening to build and test their models. Previously, most research in these areas starts from the molecular fingerprints or physiochemical features of drugs, instead of their structures.

resultsIn this paper, a model called twin Convolutional Neural Network for drugs in SMILES format (tCNNS) is introduced for phenotypic screening. tCNNS uses a convolutional network to extract features for drugs from their simplified molecular input line entry specification (SMILES) format and uses another convolutional network to extract features for cancer cell lines from the genetic feature vectors respectively. After that, a fully connected network is used to predict the interaction between the drugs and the cancer cell lines. When the training set and the testing set are divided based on the interaction pairs between drugs and cell lines, tCNNS achieves 0.826, 0.831 for the mean and top quartile of the coefficient of determinant (R

conclusionsOur approach is able to predict the drug effects on cancer cell lines with high accuracy, and its performance remains stable with less but high-quality data, and with fewer features for the cancer cell lines. tCNNS can also solve the problem of outliers in other feature space. Besides achieving high scores in these statistical metrics, tCNNS also provides some insights into the phenotypic screening. However, the performance of tCNNS drops in the blind test.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDatabases, FactualGenomicsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50NeoplasmsOrgan SpecificityPhenotypeRegression AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsConvolutional networkDeep learningGDSCPhenotypic screening

Identifiers

PMID31357929
PMCPMC6664725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.