Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357928›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing.

Jean-Claude Ogier, Sylvie Pagès, Maxime Galan, Matthieu Barret, Sophie Gaudriault

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole-genome analysis and enzymatic profiling of Bacillus spizizenii as a xylanase-producing source from Iran.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AnMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  16. Nested PCR to optimizeMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Claude OgierDGIMI, INRA, University Montpellier, 34095, Montpellier, France. Jean-Claude.Ogier@umontpellier.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-694X
Sylvie PagèsDGIMI, INRA, University Montpellier, 34095, Montpellier, France.
Maxime GalanCBGP INRA CIRAD IRD Montpellier SupAgro, Univ. Montpellier, 755 avenue du Campus Agropolis, CS 300 16, F-34988, Montferrier sur Lez cedex, France.
Matthieu BarretINRA AGROCAMPUS-Ouest, Universite d'Angers, Beaucouze, France.
Sophie GaudriaultDGIMI, INRA, University Montpellier, 34095, Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRAgropolis International · FRInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene.

resultsWe first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii.

conclusionsOur results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersAnimalsBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGenes, EssentialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaNematodaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGenetic MarkersRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneEntomopathogenic nematodesMetabarcodingMock communitiesrpoB

Identifiers

PMID31357928
PMCPMC6664775
OpenAlexW2964882428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.