Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357655›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2019

Electrochemical and Optical Biosensors for the Detection of

Priya Vizzini, Matteo Braidot, Jasmina Vidic, Marisa Manzano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Flower-Shaped PCR Scaffold-Based Lateral Flow Bioassay forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Investigation of the Efficacy of aSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Adaptation of a Commercial Qualitative BAXFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Priya VizziniDepartment of Agriculture Food Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Matteo BraidotDepartment of Agriculture Food Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Jasmina VidicMicalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-8199
Marisa ManzanoDepartment of Agriculture Food Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy. marisa.manzano@uniud.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3543-6141
University of Udine · ITAgroParisTech · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne safety has aroused tremendous research interest in recent years because of a global public health problem. The rapid and precise detection of foodborne pathogens can reduce significantly infection diseases and save lives by the early initiation of an effective treatment. This review highlights current advances in the development of biosensors for detection of

Indexed as

Campylobacterelectrochemical biosensorsfood pathogensListeria monocytogenesoptical biosensors

Identifiers

PMID31357655
PMCPMC6722628
OpenAlexW2965761395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.