ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Extraction of Peak Velocity Profiles from Doppler Echocardiography Using Image Processing.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning methods to predict transvalvular gradient waveform post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement using preprocedural echocardiogram.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- On the feasibility of ultrasound Doppler-based personalized hemodynamic modeling of the abdominal aorta.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study is to extract positive and negative peak velocity profiles from Doppler echocardiographic images. These profiles are currently estimated using tedious manual approaches. Profiles can be used to establish realistic boundary conditions for computational hemodynamic studies and to estimate cardiac time intervals, which are of clinical utility. In the current study, digital image processing algorithms that rely on intensity calculations and two different thresholding methods were proposed and tested. Image intensity histograms were used to guide threshold choices, which were selected such that the resulting velocity profiles appropriately represent Doppler shift envelopes. The resulting peak velocity profiles contained artifacts in the form of sudden velocity changes and possible outliers. To reduce these artifacts, image smoothing using a moving average process was then implemented. Bland-Altman analysis suggested good agreement between the two thresholding methods. Artifacts decreased when image smoothing was performed. Results also suggested that one thresholding method tended to provide the lower limit (i.e., underestimate) of velocities, while the second tended to provide the velocity upper limit (i.e., overestimate). Combining estimates from both methods appeared to provide a smoother peak velocity profile estimate. The proposed automated approach may be useful for objective estimation of peak velocity profiles, which may be helpful for computational hemodynamic studies and may increase the efficiency of current clinical diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.