Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357559›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

A Brief Review of Genetic Approaches to the Study of Food Preferences: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.

Antonietta Robino, Maria Pina Concas, Eulalia Catamo, Paolo Gasparini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonietta RobinoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, 34137, Trieste, Italy. antonietta.robino@burlo.trieste.it.
Maria Pina ConcasInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, 34137, Trieste, Italy.
Eulalia CatamoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, 34137, Trieste, Italy.
Paolo GaspariniInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'Istria 65/1, 34137, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute 5x1000 to Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation plays a crucial role in individual differences in food preferences which ultimately influence food selection and health. Our current understanding of this pathway has been informed through twin studies (to assess the heritability of food preferences), candidate gene studies, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, most of this literature is mainly focused on genes previously identified as having taste or smell functions. New data suggests that genes not associated with taste or smell perception may be involved in food preferences and contribute to health outcomes. This review highlights these emerging findings and suggests a polygenic risk assessment approach to explore new relationships between food preferences and health risks.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesGenetic VariationHealth BehaviorGenetic Association StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyHeredityHumansMultifactorial InheritanceOlfactory PerceptionPedigreeSmellTasteTaste PerceptionTwin Studies as Topicadipositycandidate genefood preferencesgeneticsGWASheritabilitypolygenic risk score

Identifiers

PMID31357559
PMCPMC6722914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.