Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357447›Full record

ReviewBiology2019

Classical and Emerging Regulatory Mechanisms of Cytokinesis in Animal Cells.

Vikash Verma, Alex Mogilner, Thomas J Maresca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fixing the GAP: The role of RhoGAPs in cancer.European journal of cell biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Going with the flow: insights fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vikash VermaBiology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. vverma@umass.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-4164
Alex MogilnerCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-3812
Thomas J MarescaBiology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.

Funding

Mechano-molecular regulation of kinetochore functionR01GM107026 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI MARESCA, THOMAS JOSEPH · 2013 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM107026NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary goal of cytokinesis is to produce two daughter cells, each having a full set of chromosomes. To achieve this, cells assemble a dynamic structure between segregated sister chromatids called the contractile ring, which is made up of filamentous actin, myosin-II, and other regulatory proteins. Constriction of the actomyosin ring generates a cleavage furrow that divides the cytoplasm to produce two daughter cells. Decades of research have identified key regulators and underlying molecular mechanisms; however, many fundamental questions remain unanswered and are still being actively investigated. This review summarizes the key findings, computational modeling, and recent advances in understanding of the molecular mechanisms that control the formation of the cleavage furrow and cytokinesis.

Indexed as

aurora B kinasecentralspindlin complexcortical excitabilitycytokinesisECT2microtubulespolo kinaseRhoARhoA and actin waves

Identifiers

PMID31357447
PMCPMC6784142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.