Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31357419›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Applicability Domain of Active Learning in Chemical Probe Identification: Convergence in Learning from Non-Specific Compounds and Decision Rule Clarification.

Ahsan Habib Polash, Takumi Nakano, Shunichi Takeda, J B Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahsan Habib PolashKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Biosciences, Life Science Informatics Research Unit, Kyoto, Sakyo, Yoshida, Konoemachi, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6591-3164
Takumi NakanoKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Biosciences, Life Science Informatics Research Unit, Kyoto, Sakyo, Yoshida, Konoemachi, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Shunichi TakedaKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Genetics; Kyoto, Sakyo, Yoshida, Konoemachi, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
J B BrownKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Biosciences, Life Science Informatics Research Unit, Kyoto, Sakyo, Yoshida, Konoemachi, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. jbbrown@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4637-1531
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H06306Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Core-to-Core A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient identification of chemical probes for the manipulation and understanding of biological systems demands specificity for target proteins. Computational means to optimize candidate compound selection for experimental selectivity evaluation are being sought. The active learning virtual screening method has demonstrated the ability to efficiently converge on predictive models with reduced datasets, though its applicability domain to probe identification has yet to be determined. In this article, we challenge active learning's ability to predict inhibitory bioactivity profiles of selective compounds when learning from chemogenomic features found in non-selective ligand-target pairs. Comparison of controls versus multiple molecule representations de-convolutes factors contributing to predictive capability. Experiments using the matrix metalloproteinase family demonstrate maximum probe bioactivity prediction achieved from only approximately 20% of non-probe bioactivity; this data volume is consistent with prior chemogenomic active learning studies despite the increased difficulty from chemical biology experimental settings used here. Feature weight analyses are combined with a custom visualization to unambiguously detail how active learning arrives at classification decisions, yielding clarified expectations for chemogenomic modeling. The results influence tactical decisions for computational probe design and discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMachine LearningQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAlgorithmsChemical PhenomenaComputational BiologyDatabases, ChemicalDecision Support TechniquesDecision TreesLigandsModels, TheoreticalReproducibility of ResultsLigandsactive learningactive projectionchemical probeschemogenomicscompound specificitydecision treeligand-target interactionsmolecular representation

Identifiers

PMID31357419
PMCPMC6696588
OpenAlexW2963705986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.