ArticleAnaerobe2020
Molecular epidemiology of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile isolates from hospitalized patients and the hospital environment in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Article in Anaerobe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Clostridioides difficile contamination in healthcare and non-healthcare environments: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.International health · 2026Pooled it
- Best Practices in the Management ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Make It LessGenes · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile (syn. Clostridium difficile) infection (CDI) in Bangladesh is poorly understood. This study assessed the epidemiology of CDI in hospitalized patients and hospital environmental contamination of toxigenic C. difficile at two large urban Bangladesh hospitals. This 12-month prospective observational cohort study collected stool samples from adults with diarrhea and recent antimicrobial exposure during 2017. Environmental samples were collected by swabbing surfaces of hospital common areas. Samples underwent toxigenic culture. C. difficile isolates were tested for toxins A and B and PCR-ribotyped. Of 208 stool samples, 18 (8.7%) were positive for toxigenic C. difficile. Of 400 environmental samples, 45 (11%) were positive for toxigenic C. difficile. Ribotypes present in ≥10% of stool isolates were 017 (38%), 053-163 (13%), and a novel ribotype (FP435 [13%]). Common ribotypes in environmental isolates were 017 (22%), 053-163 (11%), 106 (24%). This is the first report describing current epidemiology of CDI in at risk hospitalized adult patients in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.