Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31356835›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2019

Optimizing brain performance: Identifying mechanisms of adaptive neurobiological plasticity.

Kelly Lambert, Amelia J Eisch, Liisa A M Galea, Gerd Kempermann, Michael Merzenich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Aging in the Primary Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Less can be more: Fine tuning the maternal brain.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelly LambertDept of Psychology, B326 Gottwald Science Center, University of Richmond, VA, 23173, USA. Electronic address: klambert@richmond.edu.
Amelia J EischDept of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-4399, USA. Electronic address: eisch@upenn.edu.
Liisa A M GaleaDept of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T, Canada. Electronic address: lgalea@psych.ubc.ca.
Gerd KempermannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden and CRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden at Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: gerd.kempermann@dzne.de.
Michael MerzenichPosit Science Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94111, USA. Electronic address: Michael.merzenich@positscience.com.

Funding

Phenotyping Resilience in Rodents: Targeting Key Neurobiological Responses in DeR15MH101698 · NIMH · RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE · PI LAMBERT, KELLY G · 2014 to 2014
$429k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH101698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although neuroscience research has debunked the late 19

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalBrainCognitive ReserveHumansNeuronal PlasticityAffordancesCognitive reserveEmotional resilienceEnriched environmentNeural reserveNeuroplasticityOptimal functions

Identifiers

PMID31356835
PMCPMC8112903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.