Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31356682›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical investigation2019

Phenotyping progression of secondary mitral regurgitation in chronic systolic heart failure.

Henrike Arfsten, Philipp E Bartko, Noemi Pavo, Gregor Heitzinger, Julia Mascherbauer, Christian Hengstenberg, Martin Hülsmann, Georg Goliasch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. MUW researcher of the month.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henrike ArfstenDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5836-7759
Philipp E BartkoDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9061-4839
Noemi PavoDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3377-4507
Gregor HeitzingerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia MascherbauerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7478-1450
Christian HengstenbergDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8284-2994
Martin HülsmannDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7944-7363
Georg GoliaschDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-6104
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) drives adverse cardiac remodelling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Progression in severity over time contributes to a transition towards more advanced HF stages. Early identification of patients at risk for sMR progression remains challenging. We therefore sought to assess a broad spectrum of neurohumoral biomarkers in patients with HFrEF to explore their ability to predict progression of sMR.

methodsA total of 249 HFrEF patients were enrolled. Biomarkers encompassing key neurohumoral pathways in heart failure were sampled at baseline, and sMR progression was assessed over 3 years of follow-up.

resultsOf 191 patients with nonsevere sMR at baseline, 18% showed progressive sMR within three years after study enrolment. Progression of sMR was associated with higher levels of MR-proADM (adj.OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.29-3.93; P = .004), MR-proANP (adj.OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.14-3.00; P = .012), copeptin (adj.OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.04-2.67; P = .035) and CT-pro-ET1 (adj.OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.06-2.68; P = .027) but not with NT-proBNP (P = .54).

conclusionIncreased plasma levels of neurohumoral cardiac biomarkers are predictors of sMR progression in patients with HFrEF and add easily available incremental prognostic information for risk stratification. Importantly, NT-proBNP was not useful to predict progressive sMR in the present analysis. On the contrary, MR-proANP, primarily produced in the atria, copeptin partly triggered by intra-cardiac and intra-arterial pressures and MR-proADM, a marker of forward failure and peripheral released vasoactive CT-proET1, increase based on a progressive loading burden by sMR and may thus serve as better predictors of sMR progression.

Indexed as

AdrenomedullinAgedAtrial Natriuretic FactorBiomarkersChronic DiseaseDisease ProgressionEchocardiographyEndothelin-1FemaleGlycopeptidesHeart Failure, SystolicHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitral Valve InsufficiencyNatriuretic Peptide, BrainAdrenomedullinAtrial Natriuretic FactorBiomarkerscopeptinsC-terminal proendothelin-1Endothelin-1Glycopeptidesmid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, humanmidregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide, humanNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Protein PrecursorsHFrEFneurohumoral markersMRsMR progression

Identifiers

PMID31356682
PMCPMC6899776
OpenAlexW2966427374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.