Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31356637›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Cooperative population coding facilitates efficient sound-source separability by adaptation to input statistics.

Helge Gleiss, Jörg Encke, Andrea Lingner, Todd R Jennings, Sonja Brosel, Lars Kunz, Benedikt Grothe, Michael Pecka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endogenous Cholinergic Signaling Modulates Sound-Evoked Responses of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Listening in complex acoustic scenes.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helge GleissDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4767-8404
Jörg EnckeChair of Bio-Inspired Information Processing, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6067-1602
Andrea LingnerDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Martinsried, Germany.
Todd R JenningsDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Martinsried, Germany.
Sonja BroselDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Martinsried, Germany.
Lars KunzDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3141-0005
Benedikt GrotheDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7317-0615
Michael PeckaDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-1651
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our sensory environment changes constantly. Accordingly, neural systems continually adapt to the concurrent stimulus statistics to remain sensitive over a wide range of conditions. Such dynamic range adaptation (DRA) is assumed to increase both the effectiveness of the neuronal code and perceptual sensitivity. However, direct demonstrations of DRA-based efficient neuronal processing that also produces perceptual benefits are lacking. Here, we investigated the impact of DRA on spatial coding in the rodent brain and the perception of human listeners. Complex spatial stimulation with dynamically changing source locations elicited prominent DRA already on the initial spatial processing stage, the Lateral Superior Olive (LSO) of gerbils. Surprisingly, on the level of individual neurons, DRA diminished spatial tuning because of large response variability across trials. However, when considering single-trial population averages of multiple neurons, DRA enhanced the coding efficiency specifically for the concurrently most probable source locations. Intrinsic LSO population imaging of energy consumption combined with pharmacology revealed that a slow-acting LSO gain-control mechanism distributes activity across a group of neurons during DRA, thereby enhancing population coding efficiency. Strikingly, such "efficient cooperative coding" also improved neuronal source separability specifically for the locations that were most likely to occur. These location-specific enhancements in neuronal coding were paralleled by human listeners exhibiting a selective improvement in spatial resolution. We conclude that, contrary to canonical models of sensory encoding, the primary motive of early spatial processing is efficiency optimization of neural populations for enhanced source separability in the concurrent environment.

Indexed as

SoundAcoustic StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionGerbillinaeHumansModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysNeuronsOlivary NucleusSound Localization

Identifiers

PMID31356637
PMCPMC6687189
OpenAlexW2966601013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.