Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31356595›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Spatially constrained tumour growth affects the patterns of clonal selection and neutral drift in cancer genomic data.

Ketevan Chkhaidze, Timon Heide, Benjamin Werner, Marc J Williams, Weini Huang, Giulio Caravagna, Trevor A Graham, Andrea Sottoriva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Quantitative and sensitive sequencing of somatic mutations induced by a maize transposon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ketevan ChkhaidzeEvolutionary Genomics and Modelling Lab, Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Timon HeideEvolutionary Genomics and Modelling Lab, Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1386-7469
Benjamin WernerEvolutionary Genomics and Modelling Lab, Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Marc J WilliamsEvolution and Cancer Lab, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Weini HuangEvolution and Cancer Lab, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Giulio CaravagnaEvolutionary Genomics and Modelling Lab, Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4240-3265
Trevor A GrahamEvolution and Cancer Lab, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9582-1597
Andrea SottorivaEvolutionary Genomics and Modelling Lab, Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6709-9533

Funding

The Role of the Microbiome in Cancer Suppression and Susceptibility Across SpeciesU54CA217376 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MALEY, CARLO · 2018 to 2022
$8.6M
Cancer Research UK 19771Cancer Research UK 22909Cancer Research UK A19771Cancer Research UK A22909Medical Research Council MR/P000789/1NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217376Wellcome Trust 105104/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 202778/B/16/ZWellcome Trust 202778/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of the effect of spatial tumour sampling on the patterns of mutations detected in next-generation sequencing data is largely lacking. Here we use a spatial stochastic cellular automaton model of tumour growth that accounts for somatic mutations, selection, drift and spatial constraints, to simulate multi-region sequencing data derived from spatial sampling of a neoplasm. We show that the spatial structure of a solid cancer has a major impact on the detection of clonal selection and genetic drift from both bulk and single-cell sequencing data. Our results indicate that spatial constrains can introduce significant sampling biases when performing multi-region bulk sampling and that such bias becomes a major confounding factor for the measurement of the evolutionary dynamics of human tumours. We also propose a statistical inference framework that incorporates spatial effects within a growing tumour and so represents a further step forwards in the inference of evolutionary dynamics from genomic data. Our analysis shows that measuring cancer evolution using next-generation sequencing while accounting for the numerous confounding factors remains challenging. However, mechanistic model-based approaches have the potential to capture the sources of noise and better interpret the data.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell ProliferationClonal EvolutionComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGenetic DriftHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansModels, GeneticMutationNeoplasmsSingle-Cell AnalysisStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID31356595
PMCPMC6687187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.