Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31356468›Full record

Observational studyJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2019

PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation.

Katia Giguère, Luc Béhanzin, Fernand A Guédou, Denis Talbot, François A Leblond, Ella Goma-Matsétsé, Djimon M Zannou, Dissou Affolabi, René K Kêkê, Flore Gangbo and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katia GiguèreCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Luc BéhanzinCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Fernand A GuédouCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Denis TalbotCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
François A LeblondCentre de Recherche de l'Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Ella Goma-MatsétséDispensaire IST, Centre de Santé Communal de Cotonou 1, Cotonou, Bénin.
Djimon M ZannouFaculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Bénin.
Dissou AffolabiFaculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Bénin.
René K KêkêProgramme Santé de Lutte Contre le Sida (PSLS), Cotonou, Bénin.
Flore GangboFaculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Bénin.
Moussa BachabiProgramme Santé de Lutte Contre le Sida (PSLS), Cotonou, Bénin.
Michel AlaryCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about risk compensation among female sex workers (FSW) on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and self-report of sexual behaviors is subject to bias.

settingProspective observational PrEP demonstration study conducted among FSW in Cotonou, Benin.

methodsOver a period of 24 months, we assessed and compared trends in unprotected sex as measured by self-report (last 2 or 14 days), by detection of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and by vaginal detection of prostate-specific antigen and Y-chromosomal DNA, 2 biomarkers of semen exposure in the last 2 or 14 days, respectively. Trends were assessed and compared using a log-binomial regression that was simultaneously fit for all unprotected sex measures.

resultsOf 255 participants, 120 (47.1%) completed their follow-up. Prevalence of STI decreased from 15.8% (95% confidence interval: 11.8% to 21.0%) at baseline to 2.1% (95% confidence interval: 0.4% to 10.2%) at 24 months of follow-up (P-trend = 0.04). However, we observed no trend in self-report of unprotected sex in the last 2 (P = 0.42) or 14 days (P = 0.49), nor in prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.53) or Y chromosomal DNA (P = 0.25) over the same period. We observed no statistically significant difference between trends in self-report of unprotected sex and trends in biomarkers of semen exposure in the last 2 days (P = 0.14) or in the last 14 days (P = 0.29).

conclusionsWe observed no evidence of risk compensation, and a decrease in STI among FSW on PrEP. PrEP intervention may be an opportunity to control STI among FSW. Future studies should assess risk compensation with biomarkers of semen exposure when possible.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisSafe SexSex WorkersAdolescentAdultBeninBiomarkersDNAFemaleGenes, Y-LinkedHIV InfectionsHumansProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenSelf ReportSexual BehaviorBiomarkersDNAProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31356468
PMCPMC6798737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.