Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31356455›Full record

ArticlePain2019

Brain dysfunction in chronic pain patients assessed by resting-state electroencephalography.

Son Ta Dinh, Moritz M Nickel, Laura Tiemann, Elisabeth S May, Henrik Heitmann, Vanessa D Hohn, Günther Edenharter, Daniel Utpadel-Fischler, Thomas R Tölle, Paul Sauseng and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Decreased neural inhibitory state in fibromyalgia pain: A cross-sectional study.Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Son Ta DinhDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Moritz M NickelDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Laura TiemannDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elisabeth S MayDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Henrik HeitmannDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Vanessa D HohnDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Günther EdenharterDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel Utpadel-FischlerDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas R TölleDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paul SausengDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Joachim GrossInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Markus PlonerDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain is a common and severely disabling disease whose treatment is often unsatisfactory. Insights into the brain mechanisms of chronic pain promise to advance the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and might help to develop disease markers and novel treatments. Here, we systematically exploited the potential of electroencephalography to determine abnormalities of brain function during the resting state in chronic pain. To this end, we performed state-of-the-art analyses of oscillatory brain activity, brain connectivity, and brain networks in 101 patients of either sex suffering from chronic pain. The results show that global and local measures of brain activity did not differ between chronic pain patients and a healthy control group. However, we observed significantly increased connectivity at theta (4-8 Hz) and gamma (>60 Hz) frequencies in frontal brain areas as well as global network reorganization at gamma frequencies in chronic pain patients. Furthermore, a machine learning algorithm could differentiate between patients and healthy controls with an above-chance accuracy of 57%, mostly based on frontal connectivity. These results suggest that increased theta and gamma synchrony in frontal brain areas are involved in the pathophysiology of chronic pain. Although substantial challenges concerning the reproducibility of the findings and the accuracy, specificity, and validity of potential electroencephalography-based disease markers remain to be overcome, our study indicates that abnormal frontal synchrony at theta and gamma frequencies might be promising targets for noninvasive brain stimulation and/or neurofeedback approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrainBrain WavesChronic PainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetRest

Identifiers

PMID31356455
PMCPMC7195856
OpenAlexW2966299353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.