Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31356149›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2019

New aspects of USP30 biology in the regulation of pexophagy.

Elena Marcassa, Andreas Kallinos, Jane Jardine, Emma V Rusilowicz-Jones, Michael J Clague, Sylvie Urbé

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mammalian pexophagy at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena Marcassaa Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-644X
Andreas Kallinosa Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8771-963X
Jane Jardinea Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7646-9636
Emma V Rusilowicz-Jonesa Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7496-3318
Michael J Claguea Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3355-9479
Sylvie Urbéa Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-9814
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N00941X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondria and peroxisomes have a number of features in common: they each play interconnected roles in fatty acid and reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism and, once damaged, need to be removed by specialized autophagic mechanisms, termed mitophagy and pexophagy, respectively. Both processes can use ubiquitin as an initiating signal but whereas mitophagy has been extensively studied, pexophagy remains rather poorly understood. Our recent work, along with a new study from Kim and colleagues, has shed light on the molecular mechanism of pexophagy and the importance of reversible ubiquitination in its regulation. Collectively, these studies highlight the physiological role of the deubiquitinase USP30 in suppressing the turnover of peroxisomes.

Indexed as

AutophagyMacroautophagyMitophagyPeroxisomesUbiquitinationMitochondriaPeroxisomesPexophagyUbiquitinUSP30

Identifiers

PMID31356149
PMCPMC6693448
OpenAlexW2951945586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.