Trial reportPediatric diabetes2019
Impact of family-centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self-management resources.
Trial report in Pediatric diabetes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Supporting Caregivers Behind Youth with T1D: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial Interventions and Youth Glycemic Outcomes.Current diabetes reports · 2026Pooled it
- Parenting interventions for parents of children with type 1 diabetes-a systematic review.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2024Pooled it
- Benefits, implementation and sustainability of innovative paediatric models of care for children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review.BMC pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Educational and Psychoeducational Self-Management Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pediatric diabetes · 2024Pooled it
- The Effects of Diabetes Self-Management Education on Quality of Life for Persons With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.The science of diabetes self-management and care · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of family-centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self-management resources.Pediatric diabetes · 2019Trial
- Implementing evidence-based practices in rural settings: a scoping review of theories, models, and frameworks.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Family-centered interventions for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: an integrative review.Child health nursing research · 2023Article
- Self-care support of diet and the gut in the routine care of school-age children with long-term conditions: An integrative review.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2022Review
- Patient and healthcare team recommended medication adherence strategies for hydroxychloroquine: results of a qualitative study informing intervention development.Lupus science & medicine · 2022Article
- One Multidisciplinary Cleft and Craniofacial Team's Experience in Shifting to Family-Centered Care.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2020Article
- Using Person-Reported Outcomes (PROs) to Motivate Young People with Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2020Review
- Pre-empting the challenges faced in adolescence: A systematic literature review of effects of psychosocial interventions for preteens with type 1 diabetes.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2020Review
- Factors associated with health psychology use in pediatric type 1 diabetes.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe American Diabetes Association recommends a family-centered approach that addresses each family's specific type 1 diabetes self-management barriers.
objectiveTo assess an intervention that tailored delivery of self-management resources to families' specific self-management barriers. SUBJECTS: At two sites, 214 children 8-16 years old with type 1 diabetes and their parent(s) were randomized to receive tailored self-management resources (intervention, n = 106) or usual care (n = 108).
methodsOur intervention (1) identified families' self-management barriers with a validated survey, (2) tailored self-management resources to identified barriers, and (3) delivered the resources as four group sessions coordinated with diabetes visits. Mixed effects models with repeated measures were fit to A1c as well as parent and child QOL during the intervention and 1 year thereafter.
resultsParticipants were 44% youth (8-12 years) and 56% teens (13-16 years). No intervention effect on A1c or QOL was shown, combining data from sites and age groups. Analyzing results by site and age group, post-intervention A1c for teens at one site declined by 0.06 more per month for intervention teens compared to usual care (P < 0.05). In this group, post-intervention A1c declined significantly when baseline A1c was >8.5 (-0.08, P < 0.05), with an even larger decline when baseline A1c was >10 (-0.19, P < 0.05). In addition, for these teens, the significant improvements in A1c resulted from addressing barriers related to motivation to self-manage. Also at this site, mean QOL increased by 0.61 points per month more during the intervention for parents of intervention youth than for usual care youth (P < 0.05).
conclusionsTailored self-management resources may improve outcomes among specific populations, suggesting the need to consider families' self-management barriers and patient characteristics before implementing self-management resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.