Trial reportMycoses2019
Efficacy and safety of combination antifungal therapy in Korean haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.
Trial report in Mycoses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00531479 (A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing The Efficacy Of Anidulafungin And Voriconazole In Combination To That Of Voriconazole Alone When Used For Primary Therapy Of Proven Or Probable Invasive Aspergillosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing The Efficacy Of Anidulafungin And Voriconazole In Combination To That Of Voriconazole Alone When Used For Primary Therapy Of Proven Or Probable Invasive Aspergillosis
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of combination antifungal therapy in Korean haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.Mycoses · 2019Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Combination Antifungals as Empirical, Preemptive, and Targeted Therapies for Invasive Fungal Infections in Intensive-Care Units.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Allicin shows antifungal efficacy againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Modeling Invasive Aspergillosis: How Close Are Predicted Antifungal Targets?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of voriconazole+anidulafungin (combination) or voriconazole+placebo (monotherapy) for invasive aspergillosis (IA; NCT00531479). We present a post hoc analysis of Korean and non-Korean patients with IA (including baseline positive serum galactomannan [GM]). Immunocompromised patients ≥ 16 years with IA were randomised 1:1, combination or monotherapy, for ≥ 2 weeks' treatment. The primary endpoint was 6- and 12-week all-cause mortality (Korean modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population). Overall, 454 patients enrolled (Koreans: 56 [combination: 28, monotherapy: 28], non-Koreans: 398 [combination: 200, monotherapy: 198]). The mITT population comprised 40 Koreans (combination: 23; monotherapy: 17) and 237 non-Koreans (combination: 112; monotherapy: 125). Week 6 treatment difference in mortality rate between combination and monotherapy was -6.4% in non-Koreans. This reduction was more marked in Koreans (-22.4%). Week 12 difference in all-cause mortality between combination and monotherapy was -17.7% (Koreans) and -20.2% at Week 6 (Koreans; positive baseline GM). Week 6 mortality (Koreans [mITT]; baseline GM >0.5-2.0) was 0/13 (combination) and 2/6 (monotherapy). Serious adverse events were numerically higher for combination than monotherapy (Koreans: 57.1%, 46.4%; non-Koreans: 49.5%, 46.0%). In Koreans, combination therapy was associated with marginally better outcomes than monotherapy and more so than in non-Koreans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.