Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31355940›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2020

C-C chemokine receptor 4 expression in CD8+ cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders, and its implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Shamir Geller, Travis J Hollmann, Steven M Horwitz, Patricia L Myskowski, Melissa Pulitzer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shamir GellerDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-1057
Travis J HollmannDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1599-0433
Steven M HorwitzDepartment of Medicine, Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Patricia L MyskowskiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Melissa PulitzerDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-9186
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPatients with aggressive CD8+ cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) progress rapidly and respond poorly to therapy. Confounding treatment planning, there is clinicopathological overlap between aggressive CD8+ CTCLs and other lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). Hence, improved diagnostic methods and therapeutic options are needed. The aim of this study was to examine C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) expression as a diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker in CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs. METHODS AND

resultsForty-nine cases (41 patients) with CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs were examined, including CD8+ mycosis fungoides (MF) (n = 14), aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma (AETCL) (n = 8), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) (n = 7), CD30+ LPDs (n = 6), primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma (GDTCL) (n = 6), and others (n = 8). Immunohistochemical tissue staining was performed with a CCR4 monoclonal antibody on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. CCR4 immunostaining was graded as percentage infiltrate, i.e. high (>25%) and low (≤25%), and the results were correlated with clinicopathological diagnoses. CCR4 expression was seen in 69% of the studied cases. Any CCR4 positivity was seen in all CD8+ MF cases, in 83% of CD30+ LPD cases, in 75% of AETCL cases, in 33% of GDTCL cases, and in none of the SPTCL cases. High CCR4 expression was seen in 79% of CD8+ MF cases versus 33% of CD30+ LPD cases, in 17% of GDTCL cases, and in 12.5% of AETCL cases. Patients with more advanced MF stage had higher CCR4 expression.

conclusionsCCR4 immunohistochemistry may be an adjunct in distinguishing advanced CD8+ MF from other CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs. Although CCR4 expression may justify therapeutic targeting of this receptor in CD8+ MF, the role of such therapies in other CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs is not yet clear.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunotherapyLymphoma, T-Cell, CutaneousLymphoproliferative DisordersMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCCR4 protein, humanmogamulizumabReceptors, CCR4cell markerchemokineCTCLcutaneous T-cell lymphomaimmunotherapyMFmogamulizumabmycosis fungoides

Identifiers

PMID31355940
PMCPMC7577561
OpenAlexW2965713388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.