Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31355420›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2019

Does hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk?

H F Niles, B C Walsh, S W Woods, A R Powers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H F NilesDepartment of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
B C WalshDepartment of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
S W WoodsDepartment of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
A R PowersDepartment of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-5043
Yale University · US

Funding

8/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH082022 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WOODS, SCOTT W · 2008 to 2018
$6.0M
Enhancing the Prospective Prediction of PsychosisU01MH066160 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WOODS, SCOTT W · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
A Hearing Test for Hallucinations: Toward Development of Computational Markers for Early DiagnosisK23MH115252 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POWERS, ALBERT R · 2018 to 2022
$983k
NIAAA Short-Term Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35AA023760 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HERZOG, ERICA L, KRYSTAL, JOHN H. · 2017 to 2021
$314k
NIAAA NIH HHS T35 AA023760NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH115252NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066160NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH082022Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSubthreshold perceptual abnormalities are commonly used to identify individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing a psychotic disorder. Predictive validity for modality-specific perceptual abnormality severity on psychosis risk is unknown.

methodsWe examined prospectively collected data from 164 individuals age 12-35 meeting criteria for CHR followed for 6-24 months or until conversion to psychosis. Using intake interview notes, baseline perceptual abnormality scores were split into auditory, visual, somatic/tactile, and olfactory/gustatory components, and auditory scores were further split into those for verbal vs non-verbal content. Relationships between perceptual abnormality characteristics and conversion were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression.

resultsUnusual thought content and paranoia were predictive of conversion, but no modality-specific perceptual abnormality score predicted conversion status or days to conversion. However, when auditory perceptual abnormalities were further categorized as verbal vs non-verbal, the severity of verbal experiences was predictive of conversion to psychosis (P = 0.007).

conclusionsPerceptual abnormality scores failed to meaningfully predict conversion to psychosis in either direction in this CHR sample. However, verbal auditory experiences may identify a group of CHR individuals at elevated risk of conversion. Further exploration of the relationship between phenomenological aspects of perceptual abnormalities and conversion risk is warranted.

Indexed as

AdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHallucinationsHumansMaleParanoid DisordersPerceptionPerceptual DisordersPredictive Value of TestsProdromal SymptomsPsychotic DisordersRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Indexclinical high riskhallucinationsprodromepsychosis

Identifiers

PMID31355420
PMCPMC6752971
OpenAlexW2966081482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.