Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31355108›Full record

Article3 Biotech2019

WA-CMS-based iso-cytoplasmic restorers derived from commercial rice hybrids reveal distinct population structure and genetic divergence towards restorer diversification.

Amit Kumar, Vikram Jeet Singh, S Gopala Krishnan, K K Vinod, Prolay Kumar Bhowmick, M Nagarajan, Ranjith Kumar Ellur, Haritha Bollinedi, Ashok Kumar Singh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amit Kumar1Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, 110012 India.
Vikram Jeet Singh1Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, 110012 India.
S Gopala Krishnan1Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, 110012 India.
K K VinodRice Breeding and Genetics Research Centre, ICAR-IARI, Aduthurai, 612101 India.
Prolay Kumar Bhowmick1Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, 110012 India.
M NagarajanRice Breeding and Genetics Research Centre, ICAR-IARI, Aduthurai, 612101 India.
Ranjith Kumar Ellur1Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, 110012 India.
Haritha Bollinedi1Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, 110012 India.
Ashok Kumar Singh1Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, 110012 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-8163
Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hundred diverse iso-cytoplasmic restorer (ICR) lines carrying WA cytoplasm indicated significant but moderate variability for agro-morphological traits as well as for the microsatellite-based allele patterns. There were two major groups of ICRs based on agro-morphological clustering. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers identified allelic variants with an average of 2.48 alleles per locus and the gene diversity (GD) ranged from 0.02 to 0.62 at different loci. ICR lines showed a genetic structure involving two sub-populations, POP1 and POP2. Both the subpopulations had the presence of admixture lines. Nearest ancestry-based grouping of ICRs by neighbour-joining (NJ) method showed near similar grouping as that of sub-population division. The POP2 was the largest group but with fewer admixed lines. POP1 was more distinct than POP2. Since the hybrid parents of the ICRs had limited diversity on maternal lineage, paternal lineage was concluded as the major contributor to the observed divergence and population differentiation. ICRs developed from certain hybrids were more genetically distinct than other hybrids. Even with the moderate variability, ICRs could be considered as a potential source of fertility restoration in hybrid development because of their distinct population structure and the full complement of restorer genes they contained. ICR lines with high per se performance can be utilized in hybrid rice development by estimating their combining ability.

Indexed as

Combining abilityHybrid riceIso-cytoplasmic restorersPopulation structureSSR markers

Identifiers

PMID31355108
PMCPMC6646621
OpenAlexW2962910633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.