Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31355077›Full record

ReviewCureus2019

Central Line Catheters and Associated Complications: A Review.

Avani R Patel, Amar R Patel, Shivank Singh, Shantanu Singh, Imran Khawaja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Complications of Central Venous Line Insertion: A Case Series.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pitfalls in internal jugular vein cannulation.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Central venous pressure line insertion for the primary health care physician.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Avani R PatelInternal Medicine, Northern California Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, USA.
Amar R PatelInternal Medicine, Northern California Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, USA.
Shivank SinghInternal Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, CHN.
Shantanu SinghPulmonary Medicine, Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Imran KhawajaPulmonary Medicine, Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of a central line or central venous catheterization was brought to attention in 1929 when Dr. Werner Forssmann self-inserted a ureteric catheter through his cubital vein and into the right side of his heart. Since that time the central line technique has developed further and has become essential for the treatment of decompensating patients. Central lines are widely used for anything from rapid fluid resuscitation, to drug administration, to parenteral nutrition, and even for administering hemodialysis. Central lines come in different sizes, types, and sites of administration. Sometimes their use can be associated with complications as well. The following review article addresses these parameters of central lines and goes into detail regarding their complications.

Indexed as

bleedingcatheter knotcentral venous catheterizationcomplicationcomplicationsinfectionpneumothoraxsubclavian vein cannula insertion

Identifiers

PMID31355077
PMCPMC6650175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.