ArticleACM transactions on management information systems2019
Differential Privacy for the Vast Majority.
Article in ACM transactions on management information systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Privacy via Haar Wavelet Transform and Gaussian Mechanism for Range Query.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Marine Traditional Chinese Medicine in Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China: Development, Differences, and Trends Directions.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differential privacy has become one of the widely used mechanisms for protecting sensitive information in databases and information systems. Although differential privacy provides a clear measure of privacy guarantee, it implicitly assumes that each individual corresponds to a single record in the result of a database query. This assumption may not hold in many database query applications. When an individual has multiple records, strict implementation of differential privacy may cause significant information loss. In this study, we extend the differential privacy principle to situations where multiple records in a database are associated with the same individual. We propose a new privacy principle that integrates differential privacy with the Pareto principle in analyzing privacy risk and data utility. When applied to the situations with multiple records per person, the proposed approach can significantly reduce the information loss in the released query results with a relatively small relaxation in the differential privacy guarantee. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is evaluated using three real-world databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.