Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31355050›Full record

ArticleACM transactions on management information systems2019

Differential Privacy for the Vast Majority.

Hasan B Kartal, Xiaoping Liu, Xiao-Bai Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM transactions on management information systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hasan B KartalDepartment of Management Information Systems, College of Business and Management, University of Illinois at Springfield, One University Plaza, UHB 4030, Springfield, IL 62703.
Xiaoping LiuD'Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115.
Xiao-Bai LiDepartment of Operations and Information Systems, Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Pulichino Tong Business Center, 448, Lowell, MA 01854.

Funding

New Technology to Preserve Patient Privacy and Data Quality in Health ResearchR01LM010942 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI LI, XIAOBAI · 2011 to 2013
$679k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential privacy has become one of the widely used mechanisms for protecting sensitive information in databases and information systems. Although differential privacy provides a clear measure of privacy guarantee, it implicitly assumes that each individual corresponds to a single record in the result of a database query. This assumption may not hold in many database query applications. When an individual has multiple records, strict implementation of differential privacy may cause significant information loss. In this study, we extend the differential privacy principle to situations where multiple records in a database are associated with the same individual. We propose a new privacy principle that integrates differential privacy with the Pareto principle in analyzing privacy risk and data utility. When applied to the situations with multiple records per person, the proposed approach can significantly reduce the information loss in the released query results with a relatively small relaxation in the differential privacy guarantee. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is evaluated using three real-world databases.

Indexed as

database queryData privacyInformation systems → Database query processingnoise perturbationPareto principleSecurity and privacy → Privacy protectionsSocial and professional topics → Privacy policies

Identifiers

PMID31355050
PMCPMC6660000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.