Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354988›Full record

ReviewJournal of nutrition and metabolism2019

A Gluten-Free Diet, Not an Appropriate Choice without a Medical Diagnosis.

Ana Diez-Sampedro, Maria Olenick, Tatayana Maltseva, Monica Flowers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nutrition and metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Celiac Disease: Beyond Diet and Food Awareness.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Tritordeum: Promising Cultivars to Improve Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. New Developments in Celiac Disease Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Diez-SampedroUndergraduate Nursing, NWCNHS, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-8534
Maria OlenickUndergraduate Nursing, NWCNHS, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7122-5192
Tatayana MaltsevaUndergraduate Nursing, NWCNHS, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Monica FlowersUndergraduate Nursing, NWCNHS, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-9173
Florida International University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past, only people diagnosed with celiac disease, approximately 1% of the population, avoided gluten consumption through all their meals. However, popular media often now mistakenly present gluten-free foods as being a healthier choice, and more people have now concluded that gluten is a harmful part of the diet. A review of literature on gluten-free diets, gluten sensitivity, celiac disease, and attitudes toward gluten consumption was undertaken to examine the prevalence and consequences of adopting a gluten-free diet and to provide guidance to healthcare practitioners whose patients are now often adopting this diet without medical input. Aside from celiac disease, nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) occurs in those persons in which gluten ingestion leads to symptomatic manifestations in the absence of celiac disease or wheat allergy but who report a remission of certain symptoms after removing gluten from their diet. However, it was been shown that a large percentage of people who claim NCGS do not feel those manifestations under a double-blind challenge to gluten. Moreover, some parents, believing that ingesting gluten is detrimental for their health, adopt gluten-free diets for their children. A review of existing data shows that there are detrimental effects to going gluten free, including loss of the dietary fiber, deficiencies in dietary minerals and vitamins, and potential heavy metal exposure. Healthcare practitioners should query patients about their dietary choices, and in cases of questionable adoption of gluten-free diet, patients and parents are educated about the detriments of a gluten-free diet, and in cases where patients continue to insist on gluten-free foods, referrals to nutritional counseling are warranted in order to minimize potential harm.

Identifiers

PMID31354988
PMCPMC6636598
OpenAlexW2955689989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.