Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354974›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2019

Health diplomacy through health entrepreneurship: using hackathons to address Palestinian-Israeli health concerns.

Khalil Ramadi, Shriya Srinavasan, Rifat Atun

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Entrepreneurship on the Quality of Public Health Sector Institutions and Policies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Khalil RamadiHealth Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5864-2386
Shriya SrinavasanHealth Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Rifat AtunDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1531-5983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The universally shared values of improving health and well-being of populations make health a suitable diplomacy tool that transcends populations. The role of entrepreneurship in improving health and contributing to sustainable development is increasingly used in conjunction with traditional health diplomacy. In this paper, we present healthcare entrepreneurship as an effective health diplomacy tool that can spur economic growth, improve healthcare and generate sustainable development in communities. Improvements in health require involvement of diverse stakeholders including healthcare and non-health professionals to generate and implement sustainable problem-focused solutions. We illustrate the utility of early-stage innovation events, such as hackathons, in sparking entrepreneurship, interdisciplinary collaboration, ideation and innovation around problems specific to a local community. Specifically, we describe a hackathon organised in Nazareth, Israel as a means to bridge multicultural communities to address common health issues across the population. We suggest that health entrepreneurship is an important component of health diplomacy, and a critical ingredient for improved health, economic growth and sustainable development.

Indexed as

health policyhealth systems

Identifiers

PMID31354974
PMCPMC6626517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.