Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354857›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

Comparison of the Antibacterial Efficacy of

Ebtissam M Al-Madi, Amal A Almohaimede, Mohammad I Al-Obaida, Amani S Awaad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A new model ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  7. A Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy ofInternational journal of dentistry · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ebtissam M Al-MadiDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9758-7757
Amal A AlmohaimedeDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad I Al-ObaidaDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Amani S AwaadGateway to UK Education, Bradford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7910-6841
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe investigation aims to compare antimicrobial efficacy of the extract of

designT he dehydrated oleo-gum resin of

resultsThe largest inhibition zone diameter for both bacterial species was obtained by the 100mg/100

conclusionMyrrh extract was proven to have considerable antibacterial activity against both

Identifiers

PMID31354857
PMCPMC6637688
OpenAlexW2953528837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.