Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354802›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2019

Impact of Speller Size on a Visual P300 Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System under Two Conditions of Constraint for Eye Movement.

R Ron-Angevin, L Garcia, Á Fernández-Rodríguez, J Saracco, J M André, V Lespinet-Najib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Human visual skills for brain-computer interface use: a tutorial.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R Ron-AngevinDepartamento de Tecnología Electrónica, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8721-0585
L GarciaIMS UMR 5218, CIH, ENSC, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux, France.
Á Fernández-RodríguezDepartamento de Tecnología Electrónica, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
J SaraccoUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, IMB, UMR 5251, F-33400 Talence, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-4002
J M AndréIMS UMR 5218, CIH, ENSC, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux, France.
V Lespinet-NajibIMS UMR 5218, CIH, ENSC, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) systems are based on the well-known P300 speller presented by Farwell and Donchin for communication purposes and an alternative to people with neuromuscular disabilities, such as impaired eye movement. The purpose of the present work is to study the effect of speller size on P300-based BCI usability, measured in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction under overt and covert attention conditions. To this end, twelve participants used three speller sizes under both attentional conditions to spell 12 symbols. The results indicated that the speller size had, in both attentional conditions, a significant influence on performance. In both conditions (covert and overt), the best performances were obtained with the small and medium speller sizes, both being the most effective. The speller size did not significantly affect workload on the three speller sizes. In contrast, covert attention condition produced very high workload due to the increased resources expended to complete the task. Regarding users' preferences, significant differences were obtained between speller sizes. The small speller size was considered as the most complex, the most stressful, the less comfortable, and the most tiring. The medium speller size was always considered in the medium rank, which is the speller size that was evaluated less frequently and, for each dimension, the worst one. In this sense, the medium and the large speller sizes were considered as the most satisfactory. Finally, the medium speller size was the one to which the three standard dimensions were collected: high effectiveness, high efficiency, and high satisfaction. This work demonstrates that the speller size is an important parameter to consider in improving the usability of P300 BCI for communication purposes. The obtained results showed that using the proposed medium speller size, performance and satisfaction could be improved.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesCommunication Devices for People with DisabilitiesEvent-Related Potentials, P300Eye MovementsAdultAttentionBrainFatigueFemaleHumansMaleWritingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31354802
PMCPMC6636581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.