Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354718›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Computational Methodologies for the

Shane V van Breda, Lenka Vokalova, Claire Neugebauer, Simona W Rossi, Sinuhe Hahn, Paul Hasler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. CanineBiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Visualization and Quantification of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shane V van BredaLaboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lenka VokalovaLaboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Claire NeugebauerLaboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Simona W RossiLaboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sinuhe HahnLaboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Paul HaslerDivision of Rheumatology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are a neutrophil defensive mechanism where chromatin is expelled together with antimicrobial proteins in response to a number of stimuli. Even though beneficial in many cases, their dysfunction has been implicated in many diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. Accurate quantification of NETs is of utmost importance for correctly studying their role in various diseases, especially when considering them as therapeutic targets. Unfortunately, NET quantification has a number of limitations. However, recent developments in computational methodologies for quantifying NETs have vastly improved the ability to study NETs. Methods range from using ImageJ to user friendly applications and to more sophisticated machine-learning approaches. These various methods are reviewed and discussed in this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthritis, RheumatoidComputational BiologyDiagnostic ImagingExtracellular TrapsHumansLeukocyte ElastaseMachine LearningNeoplasmsNeutrophilsPeroxidaseSoftwareLeukocyte ElastasePeroxidasecitrullinated histonemachine-learningmyeloperoxidaseneutrophil elastaseneutrophil extracellular traps

Identifiers

PMID31354718
PMCPMC6635468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.